300566

300566 Introduction to Health Informatics Assignment 2 Type: Healthcare Service Analysis activity (in pairs) Topic: Clinical Information System Design Length: 2000 words plus Application/Interface Design Diagrams Weighting: 30% Due: Week 12 Friday 09th Oct at 11:59pm (uploaded to vUWS) ASSIGNMENT OUTLINE Your team is required to design a Clinical Information System (CIS) that is suitable for use in a private clinic that specialises in the clinical management of Asthma in Australia. You should carefully research about asthma management and consider the types of clinical issues that are relevant in caring for patients with this condition within the Australian context. Your research about the management of this condition should translate into your design. The CIS would be used for direct clinical care of the patients presenting to the private asthma management clinic. You should include consideration of the major components of a typical CIS discussed during lectures and workshops as well as consider some of the requirements of relevant clinical provider users that normally care for asthma patients and would use your system. The design should be conceptually at a high level with accompanying diagrams illustrating important aspects of the interface design and features. The level of detail required for describing the design in this assignment should be thought of as being equivalent to a marketing person pitching an idea to a potential investor who would want to invest in developing your CIS. The relevance of the design for clinically managing asthma should be readily apparent. The major components of a CIS should be comprehensively covered. Higher marks will be given to innovative designs that enhance efficiency and safe practice of managing asthma through intelligent application features. Describing the characteristics of a general CIS that applies to any clinical condition will receive much lower marks. As an example of a specialised CIS, refer to the workshop on CISs, which demonstrates an openMRS solution that is customised to the clinical management of tuberculosis. Your report should discuss why you chose in particular the design and explicitly describe the aspects of asthma management you are catering for. Any resources used to assist you in developing your design should be properly referenced. TEAM CREATION In this assignment, students will work in pairs. For those students that attend the Access Grid rooms on campus for the lectures, you may be able to choose your own partner. Once you have created a group pair, you can indicate your group on vUWS via the ‘Group Project Signup Sheet’ menu link. Choose an available group project slot according to your campus (or the campus of at least one member). Any students not in a Team let the unit coordinator know by 5:00pm Mon 07th September. It is then each team member’s responsibility to contact each other and commence work. ASSESSMENT CRITERIA • Depth of understanding of the clinical management of asthma • Clear high level description of the system design and good coverage of the major CIS components • Accompanying diagrams clearly illustrating important aspects of the interface design and features that match the descriptions • Relevance of the specialised design for the clinical and administrative management of asthma • Design innovation that enhances the efficient and safe practice of managing asthma through intelligent application features • Structure, format and quality of writing • Reference List SUBMISSION CRITERIA You should submit your final report and application/interface design diagrams to vUWS under the ‘Assignments’ directory. MARKING CRITERIA CRITERIA Excellent (HD !" D) Satisfactory (C!" P) Un-satisfactory (F) Type and variety of research resources used (10%) Extensive and varied research resources are used. AND Proper referencing is given to the resources Much of the required research elements are provided. May not be extensive or may lack consistency. OR Proper references not provided to the sources Have not carried out any research in sourcing answers Demonstration of understanding of research material (15%) Excellent understanding of the research material provided A reasonable attempt at understanding the research material provided Limited or poor understanding of the research material provided Clear and cohesive high level description of the system design with good coverage of system capabilities (30%) Very clear and cohesive description of features with accompanying diagrams, and excellent coverage of all relevant features Overall reasonable attempt at describing systems features although lacking in some detail or coverage of system capabilities Descriptions are ad hoc, lacking in detail and are poorly represented by accompanying diagrams Relevance to the healthcare service (20%) Highly tailored designed according to the requirements of the healthcare service Good relevance of process/interface design features to the healthcare service although some features are generally applicable to any service Poor relevance of system features to the healthcare service OR A standard process/ interface that has been “cut and pasted” from existing systems without referencing Design innovation and intelligent application of features (15%) Highly innovative design enhancing efficiency and safe practice of the healthcare service Good design features that are innovative although some features are standard process/ interface components applicable to any healthcare service Poorly innovative or standard design with very limited application to the healthcare service Structure format and quality of writing (10%) Outstanding in terms of structure format and quality of writing While the structure and quality of the writing is good, could have improved in organising the report in a better way Students have not made any attempt to structure the report in any formal way OR Some “cut and pasted” information is provided without any flow or referencing -END

IS IT YOUR FIRST TIME HERE? WELCOME

USE COUPON "11OFF" AND GET 11% OFF YOUR ORDERS