As a patient, after the fact, Dax still disagreed with his doctor’s choice, even though he now lived a good life. What are his reasons for disagreeing? Connect his answer to the Principle of Autonomy, Formula of Ends, or Harm Principle and explain the connection. Cite specific page numbers in the reading. (This prompt connects with Module Objectives 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6. The Module Objectives can be found on the Guide and Checklist at the beginning of this Module)
Example of citing:
Dax said he is happy now and probably happier than most people (Burt, 1998, p. 17).
Source: Burt, Robert A., "Confronting Death: Who Chooses? Who Controls? A Dialogue between Dax Cowart and Robert Burt" (1998). Faculty Scholarship Series. Paper 706.
For more details, see the “In-text citations” guidelines (Links to an external site.) at the Bellevue College Library website: http://bellevuecollege.libguides.com/c.php?g=364310&p=2460805
Discussion Prompt 2
Imagine that you are in the same situation as the current Dax. Would you, like Dax, regret that the doctors kept you alive when you were in pain? Or would you be glad they had overruled your wishes because you have a good life now? Why? State a premise in Dax’s argument that you agree or disagree with, or that you think would not apply to a different case. Cite specific page numbers
Sample Solution
Dax Cowart disagreed with his doctor's choice to keep him alive, even though he now lived a good life. He gave a number of reasons for this disagreement.
Principle of Autonomy
One of Dax's main reasons for disagreeing with his doctor's choice was that it violated his autonomy. The principle of autonomy is the principle that individuals have the right to make their own decisions about their bodies and their lives. This principle is based on the idea that individuals are the best judges of their own interests and that they should be allowed to live their lives in accordance with their own values and beliefs.
Full Answer Section
Dax believed that he had the right to decide whether or not to receive life-saving treatment, even if that meant that he would die. He felt that his doctor's decision to override his wishes was a violation of his autonomy and his right to self-determination.
Harm Principle
Another reason that Dax disagreed with his doctor's choice was that he believed that it caused him more harm than good. The harm principle is the principle that individuals should be free to do whatever they want, as long as they do not harm others.
Dax argued that the treatment that he received caused him a great deal of pain and suffering. He also argued that it prevented him from living the life that he wanted to live. He felt that the harm caused by the treatment outweighed any benefits that he may have received.
Formula of Ends
The formula of ends is a principle that is used to determine whether or not an action is morally right. The principle states that an action is morally right if it is a means to a good end and if it does not produce any unintended bad consequences.
Dax argued that his doctor's decision to keep him alive was not morally right because it was not a means to a good end. He believed that he would have been better off if he had been allowed to die. He also argued that the treatment that he received had unintended bad consequences, such as causing him pain and suffering.
Dax's Regret
Dax regretted that the doctors kept him alive, even though he now lived a good life. He felt that he had been denied the right to make his own decisions about his body and his life. He also felt that the treatment that he received caused him more harm than good.
My Perspective
If I were in the same situation as Dax, I would also regret that the doctors kept me alive against my wishes. I believe that individuals have the right to make their own decisions about their bodies and their lives, even if those decisions mean that they will die. I also believe that the harm caused by forcing someone to undergo unwanted medical treatment outweighs any benefits that they may receive.
Dax's Argument
One of Dax's premises that I agree with is the premise that individuals have the right to make their own decisions about their bodies and their lives. This premise is based on the principle of autonomy, which I believe is a fundamental principle of medical ethics.
Another premise of Dax's argument that I agree with is the premise that the harm caused by forcing someone to undergo unwanted medical treatment outweighs any benefits that they may receive. This premise is based on the harm principle, which I also believe is a fundamental principle of medical ethics.
Different Cases
Dax's argument would not apply to all cases. For example, if someone were to refuse medical treatment that was necessary to save their life, but that treatment would not cause them any pain or suffering, then I would not agree with their decision. I believe that it is morally wrong to allow someone to die when there is a simple treatment that could save their life.
However, in Dax's case, the treatment that he received was painful and caused him a great deal of suffering. He also did not believe that the treatment would improve his quality of life. In this case, I believe that Dax had the right to refuse treatment, even if that meant that he would die.
Conclusion
Dax Cowart's case is a complex and challenging one. There are strong arguments on both sides of the issue. However, I believe that Dax had the right to make his own decisions about his body and his life, even if those decisions meant that he would die.
We are here to help
We have crazy offers
It’s quick and easy to place an order. We have an efficient customer service that works 24/7 to assist you.It’s quick and easy to place an order. We have an efficient customer service that works 24/7 to assist you.