Administration Approach to Cybersecurity

 


Write a 5-page paper analyzing 2023’s National Cybersecurity Strategy Implementation Plan (NCSIP), which supports the NCS 2023, the Biden Administration’s approach to cybersecurity. Keep in mind that NIST recommends an approach to and best practices for cybersecurity. It is voluntary not a mandatory scheme. However, certain industries require the NIST approach. In addition, Congress has passed laws that mandate the NIST approach, especially for critical industries. A general outline is provided to provide a broad structure for the paper. You may use additional sections and add them to the paper. This is a lot of material, and the paper is brief. The idea is not to be overly comprehensive, but instead to convey that you understand and can clearly state what the NCS 2023 does, how it is expected to work, and to have you demonstrate your ability to analyze a policy and explain how it can be applied from a governance perspective.

In your paper, be sure to address each of the following prompts:
1. Explain your perspective on the NCSIP’s shift to partnering with and relying on the private sector. List 5 key elements of the plan and analyze them. Discuss whether you think this could be more or less successful than the federal government’s previous strategies, based on the elements in the plan and the articles written about it, that are in your resources. You will base your analysis on these, other resources you find and cite, and your experience if you are working in this field.

 

 


2. Explain what the NCSIP intends to accomplish and discuss how the private sector can improve the U.S. approach to governing privacy and protecting information. Explain how the transformational changes in technology that are occurring in cybersecurity will impact this strategy by choosing a topic in technology such as artificial intelligence, or digital identification, or the expansive use of mobile devices to provide an opinion on how technology influences how a policy is used.
3. Critique the evaluation of some authors of the NCSIP as a “game changer”; is their outlook too optimistic? Provide sources and rationale for your answer to that question. This means you read the articles provided here that discuss this topic and then support your opinion with information you cite from those articles, or other articles that you found through research.
4. Comment on how the NIST Framework improves the potential for the government or the private sector to manage and reduce cybersecurity risk. As an approach you can cite a section from the framework and explain how this supports risk management.
5. Write the paper with an organized, logical flow of information. Cite sufficient authoritative sources so that it is evident that your analysis is based on the documents provided other documents you find through your research. Please use a consistent citation style.

 

Sample Answer

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

The 2023 National Cybersecurity Strategy: A Governance Perspective

 

The Biden Administration’s 2023 National Cybersecurity Strategy (NCS) and its accompanying Implementation Plan (NCSIP) mark a significant evolution in the U.S. approach to cybersecurity. Moving away from a primarily defensive, government-led posture, the strategy embraces a philosophy of shared responsibility and strategic partnership, particularly with the private sector. This paper will analyze the core tenets of the NCSIP, its reliance on public-private collaboration, and the potential for this approach to redefine cybersecurity governance in the United States. It will also critique the optimistic "game changer" label,

Exploring a Federal Cyber Insurance Backstop: The plan assesses the need for a federal insurance response to catastrophic cyber events. This recognizes that the private cyber insurance market may not be sufficient to cover large-scale, systemic attacks. It’s an element that shares the risk of major events, underscoring the government’s role as a backstop in a truly collaborative defense model.

This strategy has the potential to be significantly more successful than previous government-centric strategies. Past approaches often relied on voluntary guidelines or, alternatively, reactive regulations that struggled to keep pace with rapidly evolving threats. The new plan's focus on shared liability and market forces has the potential to fundamentally change behavior and incentivize long-term investment in security. The challenge, however, will be in implementation. Relying on the private sector, while necessary, carries risks, including a potential lack of accountability and the possibility that profit motives could override public good. However, by using a mix of regulatory harmonization, incentives, and liability shifts, the government is attempting to align private sector interests with national security goals, which is a more sustainable model than simply mandating compliance.

IS IT YOUR FIRST TIME HERE? WELCOME

USE COUPON "11OFF" AND GET 11% OFF YOUR ORDERS