Describe a situation with which you have first-hand familiarity. You may have been a major or minor actor in the situation, or may have merely witnessed the situation. In any event, the requirements are that the situation raise ethical or legal issues in a professional setting and that you were there. It would not be appropriate to analyze a situation if you were not in a position to observe it directly A suggested structure for the final paper is as follows: • Context: Provide a description of the context within which the situation arose, including the industry, business practices, and other relevant issues, including team dynamics, personalities, etc. This description must be detailed and rich enough to allow the reader to get a clear sense of the ethical/legal dilemma(s) (-2-3 pages).
• Analysis: Analyze the dilemma using concepts or methods from the course readings. You may consider the dilemma from the point of view of different stakeholders, comparing and contrasting different analytical perspectives. Apply some methods of ethical, psychological, and/or legal reasoning to the situation and examine the result of this application. Ultimately, what do you think is/was the right thing to do in the situation?
• Conclusion: Ethical Systems Design: Conduct an "ethical audit" of the company using concepts from multiple modules by identifying risk points, and describing how the organization currently handles ethical risks. Drawing on course related content offer specific recommendations for how the organization could make changes that would improve its ethics and decrease its ethical and reputation risk going forward. In this section assume that you are a senior level manager who is responsible for maintaining ethical systems at the firm