In our society, both gender and peer groups play a vital role in the developing child's life.
Please talk about how gender roles influence the developing child, cognitively, physically, and social/emotionally. Is gender biological or is it influenced by society? Are people born gay? What about trans? What sources can you cite to defend your statements?
Peer groups, particularly in middle childhood and adolescence are often greatly influenced by and formed around gender. What is the importance of a peer group? How does being involved in one (or not) impact growth and development in all the domains? [Cognitive, physical, and social/emotional] What sources can you cite to defend your statements?
Sample Solution
It's important to approach these complex topics with sensitivity and rely on current scientific understanding. I will address gender roles, the origins of gender and sexual orientation, and the impact of peer groups on development.
How Gender Roles Influence the Developing Child
Gender roles are the sets of societal norms and expectations about how individuals should behave, think, and feel based on their assigned gender at birth (male or female). These roles significantly influence a child's development across cognitive, physical, and social/emotional domains.
Cognitive Influence:
- Stereotype Threat: When children are aware of gender stereotypes, their performance in domains associated with their gender can be affected. For instance, girls might underperform in math if they internalize the stereotype that "boys are better at math," even if they have the same aptitude. Similarly, boys might avoid subjects perceived as "feminine," like literature or arts. This can limit their cognitive exploration and skill development (Spencer, Steele, & Quinn, 1999).
- Cognitive Schemas: Children develop gender schemas—mental frameworks that organize information about gender. These schemas influence how children perceive, interpret, and remember information, often leading them to pay more attention to and remember information consistent with gender stereotypes (Martin & Ruble, 2004). This can narrow their cognitive understanding of the world and limit their perceived possibilities.
- Toy and Activity Choice: Gender roles often dictate what toys and activities are considered appropriate. "Boy toys" (e.g., building blocks, action figures) may promote spatial reasoning and problem-solving, while "girl toys" (e.g., dolls, art supplies) may foster language, fine motor skills, and social interaction. Limiting a child to one set of toys based on gender can restrict the development of a full range of cognitive skills.
Physical Influence:
- Activity Levels and Sports: Gender roles often prescribe different levels and types of physical activity. Boys are typically encouraged more intensely in competitive sports and rough-and-tumble play, which can lead to higher levels of physical fitness, strength, and gross motor skill development. Girls, on the other hand, may be steered towards less physically demanding activities or sports emphasizing grace over strength, potentially impacting their physical development and health outcomes (Birch & Davison, 2002).
- Body Image and Health Behaviors: Societal gender roles heavily influence body image ideals. Girls are often exposed to pressure to be thin, which can contribute to eating disorders and negative body image. Boys may face pressure to be muscular and strong, leading to unhealthy supplement use or extreme exercise routines. These pressures can impact physical health and well-being (Harrison & Cantor, 1997).
- Risk-Taking Behaviors: Traditional gender roles can influence risk-taking. Boys might be encouraged to be more adventurous and take more physical risks, potentially leading to higher rates of injury, while girls might be discouraged from such behaviors.
Social/Emotional Influence:
- Emotional Expression: Gender roles often dictate how emotions should be expressed. Boys are frequently socialized to suppress emotions like sadness and vulnerability, while girls may be encouraged to be more emotionally expressive, particularly with "softer" emotions. This can limit emotional literacy in boys and lead to an over-emphasis on certain emotions in girls, impacting their ability to develop a full range of coping mechanisms and emotional intelligence (Brody & Hall, 2000).It's important to approach these complex topics with sensitivity and rely on current scientific understanding. I will address gender roles, the origins of gender and sexual orientation, and the impact of peer groups on development.