Case Study: A 65-year-old woman had just been diagnosed with Stage 3 non-Hodgkin's lymphoma

  Case Study: A 65-year-old woman had just been diagnosed with Stage 3 non-Hodgkin's lymphoma. She was informed of this diagnosis in her primary care physician's office. She leaves her physician's office and goes home to review all of her tests and lab results with her family. She goes home and logs into her PHR. She is only able to pull up a portion of her test results. She calls her physician's office with this concern. The office staff discussed that she had part of her lab work completed at a lab not connected to the organization, part was completed at the emergency room, and part was completed in the lab that is part of the doctor's office organization. The above scenario might be a scenario that you have commonly worked with in clinical practice. For many reasons, patients often receive healthcare from multiple organizations that might have different systems. As you review this scenario, reflect and answer these questions for this discussion. • What are the pros and cons of the situation in the case study? • What safeguards are included in patient portals and PHRs to help patients and healthcare professionals ensure safety? • Do you agree or disagree with the way that a patient obtains Personal Health Records (PHRs)? • What are the challenges for patients that do not have access to all of the PHRs? Remember, only portions of the EHRs are typically included in the PHRs.

Sample Solution

     

Pros and Cons of the Situation in the Case Study

Pros:

  • Accessibility: Patient portals and PHRs provide patients with convenient access to their medical records, allowing them to review their test results, lab reports, and other health information at their own time and pace. This can empower patients to be more informed about their health and make informed decisions about their care.

Full Answer Section

   
  • Empowerment: Patient portals and PHRs can enhance patient engagement and empower them to take a more active role in managing their health. By reviewing their medical records, patients can identify potential issues and ask questions during their doctor's appointments.

  • Communication: Patient portals can facilitate communication between patients and their healthcare providers. Patients can send secure messages to their doctors, ask questions, and receive updates on their care.

Cons:

  • Fragmentation: As the case study illustrates, patients often receive care from multiple providers and organizations, leading to fragmented medical records stored in different systems. This can make it difficult for patients and providers to access a complete picture of the patient's health history.

  • Security: Patient portals and PHRs handle sensitive personal health information, so data security is paramount. While these systems are designed with security measures in place, there is always a risk of data breaches or unauthorized access.

  • Incompleteness: Patient portals and PHRs typically only contain a portion of the patient's electronic health record (EHR). This means that patients may not have access to all the information they need to make informed decisions about their care.

Safeguards in Patient Portals and PHRs

Patient portals and PHRs employ various safeguards to protect patient privacy and security. These measures include:

  • User authentication: Patients must log in using secure credentials, such as a username and password, to access their PHRs.

  • Access controls: Access to patient information is restricted to authorized users, such as patients, their healthcare providers, and designated caregivers.

  • Data encryption: Patient data is encrypted both at rest and in transit to protect it from unauthorized access.

  • Audit trails: Patient portals and PHRs maintain audit trails that track user activity, allowing for monitoring and investigation of any suspicious activity.

  • Regular security updates: PHRs are regularly updated with the latest security patches to address vulnerabilities and protect against emerging threats.

Obtaining Personal Health Records (PHRs)

The process of obtaining a PHR varies depending on the healthcare provider or organization. Some providers may automatically grant patients access to their PHRs, while others may require patients to sign up for an account or request access through a specific process.

In general, patients should be able to access their PHRs directly from their healthcare provider's website or through a mobile app. Some providers may also allow patients to obtain their PHRs through a third-party PHR service.

Challenges for Patients Without Access to PHRs

Patients without access to their PHRs face several challenges, including:

  • Limited access to medical information: Without access to their PHRs, patients may have difficulty accessing their medical history, lab results, and other important health information. This can make it difficult for them to track their progress, identify potential issues, and make informed decisions about their care.

  • Increased reliance on providers: Patients without PHRs may need to rely more heavily on their healthcare providers to provide them with copies of their medical records. This can be time-consuming and inconvenient for both patients and providers.

  • Difficulty coordinating care: Patients who receive care from multiple providers may have difficulty coordinating their care without access to a comprehensive view of their medical history. This can lead to duplicate tests, unnecessary procedures, and potential conflicts in care.

Overall, patient portals and PHRs can provide significant benefits for patients and healthcare providers by improving access to medical information, enhancing patient engagement, and facilitating communication. However, it is crucial to address the challenges of fragmented records and ensure that patients have equitable access to their health data.

IS IT YOUR FIRST TIME HERE? WELCOME

USE COUPON "11OFF" AND GET 11% OFF YOUR ORDERS