: Compare and contrast two different approaches to recovery and social inclusion highlighting the implications of the approaches for innovative practice development.

: Compare and contrast two different approaches to recovery and social inclusion highlighting the implications of the approaches for innovative practice development.

Paper details:

My chosen approaches are medication and WRAP ( Wellness Recovery Action Plan)
The introduction to explain that medication is a clinical & pharmacology tackling the brain while WRAP is living with the symptoms. The body to cover the comparing and
contrasting. The innovative practice development bit to include that medication is the first line intervention after diagnosis, WRAP is used to prevent future
relapses(include peer support,education, family,wellness,triggers,hope etc. The intervention bit could cover resources(unit cost),training of both staff and sufferers
(check Hearing voices network for reference) & Evidence of recovery could cover rating scales eg quality of life. The writer can also cover cost cutting, access,side
effects, prescriptions on medication and being in control under WRAP
Conclusion can cover that both interventions are paramount for recovery and professionals need to work hand in hand with the recovering people(not sure if I am making
myself clear)

The reference needed MUST be Modern including Ellen Longan, Mary Ellen Copeland, Judith Cook, Jullie Repper, the ImROC