Complexity And Contingency
The Alaska Native Claims Settlement Act (ANCSA) and the Native corporation system have been good for Alaska Natives.
OR
ANCSA and the Native corporation system have been bad for Alaska Natives.
Next, revise the statement you have chosen to reflect the complexity of the historical events surrounding this issue. Provide specific examples of how ANCSA and the Native corporation system have had a positive or negative impact—or perhaps both—on Alaska Natives. Further illustrate the complexity of this issue by showing how the passage of ANCSA was contingent on at least three historical events or forces.
In response to your peers, reflect on their revised statement. Describe the ways you find it shows the complexity of the event, and provide a suggestion for how they can further develop the statement or the supporting examples.
Sample Solution
ANCSA and the Native corporation system have had both positive and negative impacts on Alaska Natives.
Positive impacts:
- ANCSA provided Alaska Natives with a significant financial settlement, which helped to improve their economic well-being.
- The Native corporation system has created jobs and opportunities for Alaska Natives.
- ANCSA has helped to preserve Alaska Native culture and traditions.
Full Answer Section
Negative impacts:- ANCSA led to the extinguishment of Alaska Native aboriginal land title.
- The Native corporation system has been plagued by corruption and mismanagement.
- ANCSA has contributed to social and economic inequality among Alaska Natives.
- The discovery of oil in Alaska in the 1960s led to a boom in development and a growing awareness of the need to address Alaska Native land claims.
- The rise of the Alaska Native civil rights movement in the 1960s and 1970s gave Alaska Natives a powerful voice to advocate for their rights.
- The political will to address Alaska Native land claims was heightened by the need to build the Trans-Alaska Pipeline.