Correlation is the process of establishing a relationship between two or more factors

Correlation is the process of establishing a relationship between two or more factors. Correlation is an important concept that can be misused. One misuse is saying that factor A is caused by factor B just because a correlation is found. The cause cannot be implied simply from correlation. Find two examples in scholarly articles within the last 10 years that use correlation analysis. One of the articles must use correlation to imply causation correctly and one article should not have justification to imply cause. Summarize both articles in at least 500 words. Explain why the cause was appropriate in one article and not in the other. What would be needed for the second article to justify a statement of cause? While APA style is not required for the body of this assignment, solid academic writing is expected, and documentation of sources should be presented using APA formatting guidelines, which can be found in the APA Style Guide, located in the Student Success Center. This assignment uses a rubric. Please review the rubric before beginning the assignment to become familiar with the expectations for successful completion. You are required to submit this assignment to LopesWrite. A link to the LopesWrite technical support articles is located in Class Resources if you need assistance.

Sample Solution

       

Correlation and Causation: A Misconception

Correlation analysis is a statistical technique used to measure the strength and direction of the relationship between two variables. While it is a powerful tool for identifying associations, it is crucial to understand that correlation does not imply causation.  

Example 1: Correlation Implying Causation

Article: "The Impact of Social Media Use on Mental Health: A Correlational Study"

This study explored the relationship between social media use and mental health outcomes, such as depression and anxiety. The researchers found a significant positive correlation between the time spent on social media and the severity of mental health symptoms. Based on these findings, the authors concluded that excessive social media use can lead to poorer mental health.

Why is this conclusion questionable?

While the study found a correlation between social media use and mental health, it cannot definitively prove causation. Other factors, such as preexisting mental health conditions or socioeconomic factors, may influence both social media use and mental health outcomes. To establish causation, a more rigorous research design, such as a randomized controlled trial, would be necessary.  

Full Answer Section

       

Example 2: Correlation Used Correctly

Article: "The Relationship Between Physical Activity and Cognitive Function in Older Adults"

This study examined the association between physical activity levels and cognitive function in older adults. The researchers found a significant positive correlation between physical activity and cognitive performance, such as memory and attention.  

Why is the conclusion justified in this case?

In this study, the conclusion that physical activity can improve cognitive function is more justified. There is a strong biological basis for this relationship, with physical activity promoting brain health and reducing the risk of neurodegenerative diseases. While other factors may influence both physical activity and cognitive function, the evidence suggests a causal link.  

What is Needed to Justify Causation in the First Article?

To establish a causal relationship between social media use and mental health, the researchers would need to conduct a well-designed experiment. This would involve randomly assigning participants to different levels of social media use and then measuring their mental health outcomes over time. By controlling for other factors and randomly assigning participants, researchers can isolate the effect of social media use on mental health.

In conclusion, correlation analysis is a valuable tool for identifying relationships between variables. However, it is important to exercise caution when interpreting the results and avoid making causal claims without sufficient evidence. By understanding the limitations of correlation and using rigorous research methods, we can draw more accurate and meaningful conclusions.

IS IT YOUR FIRST TIME HERE? WELCOME

USE COUPON "11OFF" AND GET 11% OFF YOUR ORDERS