Critical Legal Thinking Case Assignment Three

Critical Legal Thinking Case Assignment Three

Respond to the following Factual Scenario. Your responses must be in APA format. A Critical Legal Thinking Rubric for preparing your responses to Critical Legal

Thinking Case Assignments is posted in COURSE INFORMATION.
Submit your response to me using the appropriate assignment link. Be sure to follow the instructions for submitting assignments. They are located in COURSE

Important Guidelines
1. Your score will be determined by evaluation of your substantive content. Your analysis and solutions as applicable must be based on the principles of law, ethics,

or business principles presented in the text and on the course site–not merely on your opinions. You must describe how application of the principles of law to the key

facts support your determination of the issues. You need to show the reasoning behind your decision.
2. The length of your response has no bearing on your score. There is no minimum or limit. Most responses will be from two to three substantive pages.
3. Key facts are those facts that determine if the principles of law are met. You do not need to repeat the factual scenario. Doing so does not meet the requirement of

recognizing the key facts. You must still demonstrate you recognize those key facts.
Factual Scenario:
Pat Painter has a contract to paint Harry Homeowner?s house for $6,000.00. Pat would supply all materials at a cost to Pat of $1,000. This is a valid contract in every

respect. Harry breaches the contract by refusing to let Pat paint the house, which Pat found out before spending any money on the materials. Pat is able to find

another job that nets a profit of $4,200 during that same time that Harry?s house was to be painted.
Discuss the amount of damages, if anything, Pat can recover from Harry?


Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *