Debate surrounds the use of indeterminate sentencing and discretionary parole release

Considerable debate surrounds the use of indeterminate sentencing and discretionary parole release. Based on the assigned readings (and outside resources as needed), briefly identify at least two pros and two cons of discretionary parole release. After identifying pros and cons, make an empirically-informed argument regarding if/how discretionary parole release should be used in the corrections system.  

Sample Solution

   

Discretionary Parole Release: Weighing the Pros and Cons

Discretionary parole release, where a board determines an inmate's eligibility for early release based on various factors, has its merits and drawbacks. Here's a breakdown based on assigned readings and external research:

Pros:

  • Rehabilitation Focus: Parole allows for release based on an inmate's demonstrated rehabilitation and reduced risk of re-offending. This incentivizes good behavior and participation in prison programs. (Clear, T., & Latessa, E. J.
   

Full Answer Section

       
  • (2014). The handbook of correctional rehabilitation (3rd ed.). Willan Publishing.)
  • Reduced Prison Population: Discretionary parole can alleviate prison overcrowding, potentially allowing for improved conditions and resource allocation for remaining inmates. (The Sentencing Project, https://www.sentencingproject.org/about/)

Cons:

  • Lack of Consistency: Discretionary decisions can be subjective and vary depending on the parole board composition and inmate characteristics, leading to inconsistencies in release decisions. (Dilulio, J. J. (2007). Governing prisons: A comparative perspective. Oxford University Press.)
  • Early Release Risk: Releasing inmates who haven't fully rehabilitated or pose a higher risk can endanger public safety. (Petersilia, J. (2003). When prisoners come home: Parole and prisoner reentry. Oxford University Press.)

An Informed Argument for Discretionary Parole:

Discretionary parole release can be a valuable tool in the corrections system, but with limitations and safeguards to address the drawbacks. Here's how it can be used effectively:

  • Structured Guidelines: Establish clear and objective criteria for parole eligibility, considering factors like offense severity, risk assessment scores, and program completion.
  • Data-Driven Decisions: Parole boards should utilize risk assessment instruments and recidivism data to inform their decisions, promoting a more data-driven approach.
  • Rehabilitation Focus: Maintain an emphasis on rehabilitation programs within prisons, linking participation and progress to increased parole eligibility.
  • Transparency and Review: Ensure transparency in parole board decision-making and establish strong review processes for potential inconsistencies.

By implementing these safeguards, discretionary parole release can provide an incentive for rehabilitation while prioritizing public safety by utilizing data-driven decision-making. However, it's crucial to continuously monitor the effectiveness of the system and make adjustments as needed.

Additionally:

Consider exploring the growing trend of determinate sentencing with "earned time" provisions. This approach offers some of the benefits of parole while potentially reducing concerns about subjectivity in decision-making.

 

IS IT YOUR FIRST TIME HERE? WELCOME

USE COUPON "11OFF" AND GET 11% OFF YOUR ORDERS