Don Gorney was a “repo man”

Full Answer Section

Element in Question:

In this case, the specific element of the "duty of care" rule in question is whether Valley of Sun's actions in repossessing the car (unscrewing the lightbulb, setting off the alarm) were foreseeable in creating a situation that could lead to harm to someone like Griffith.

Sample Solution

Legal Issue:

Did Valley of Sun, the repossession company, owe a duty of reasonable care to Griffith, the neighbor who was accidentally shot?

This question asks whether the company's actions (or inactions) created a legal obligation to protect Griffith from harm.

Rule of Law:

Duty of Care: In negligence cases, a key principle is the "duty of care." This principle establishes whether a defendant (Valley of Sun) has a legal obligation to act in a reasonably careful way to avoid foreseeable harm to the plaintiff (Griffith).