Echazabal v Chevron USA, Inc. Case

1. Look again at the facts offered by both majority and dissent. Why do you think Echazabal was willing to risk his health by working in the coker unit? Assuming he had a complete grasp pf the risk involved, is it ethical to allow him to work there?

2. Chevron gave certain reason for refusing to allow Echazabal to work in the coker unit? Name them. Can you think of any other reasons the company may have had for that decision?