Order Description
Group Discussion: Step 2: Collect the Data
Effective early childhood leaders positively impact their programs by making targeted, data-driven decisions. They become consumers of
information, systematically evaluating and acting upon the insights gained through data collection.
In this Group Discussion Board, you and your group members share data collected from Connor Street’s evaluations. Like a detective, you
begin your investigation by sifting through the data to highlight information about the program’s strengths and opportunities for
improvement. You then use this information to provide insight into the program’s effectiveness.
To prepare
Review the Head Start resources presented in this module. As you explore the interactive content and videos, reflect on best practices early
childhood leaders use to collect data. Then, revisit the evaluation you selected in Week 4, conducting additional research to learn more
about this evaluation. Last, begin a preliminary review of your evaluation data and the data that are presented in evaluations 5 and 6.
Part 1
• Provide a broader introduction to your evaluation by explaining at least two aspects and/or details about this evaluation that the “Major
Findings” document did not include. For example, you might include information about how the evaluation is scored, average scores across a
specific demographic region, and/or how this evaluation became prominent in the field of early childhood.
• Provide at least one website about this evaluation which your group can use as a resource.
Part 2
• Describe the major findings that you analyzed, including the stakeholders for whom the data were obtained and/or focused.
• Using the information garnered from your evaluation and evaluations 6 and 7:
o Describe what you perceive to be program strengths.
o Describe what you perceive to be opportunities for improvement.
o Explain how effective the might program be and why.
Support your analysis with specific references to evaluation data and the evaluation’s scoring and/or rating scale.
——————————
“Evaluating
and Supporting Early Childhood Programs”. I am majoring in Early Childhood Education, and I am a PHD student. All orders/papers that you
will help write for me will be about Early Childhood Education. ? Everything for this course is on program evaluation for early childhood
education Here is the title of this assignment/paper. Title of Paper: Step 2: Collect the Data, and Explain the Data This paper/Order as 2
parts. Please make sure to complete the 2 parts, and answer all the questions that needs to be answered in both parts of the paper Effective
early childhood leaders positively impact their programs by making targeted, data-driven decisions. They become consumers of information,
systematically evaluating and acting upon the insights gained through data collection. In this Group Discussion Board, you and your group
members share data collected from Connor Street’s evaluations. Like a detective, you begin your investigation by sifting through the data to
highlight information about the program’s strengths and opportunities for improvement. You then use this information to provide insight into
the program’s effectiveness. Here are the instructions for this assignment/paper. To prepare: Review the Head Start resources that I have
uploaded for you. As you explore the interactive content and videos, reflect on best practices early childhood leaders use to collect data.
Then, revisit the evaluation you selected in Week 4 (Which is Evaluation 4; Program Administration Scale (PAS), and evaluation 5; NAEYC
accreditation decision report), conducting additional research to learn more about this evaluation. Last, begin a preliminary review of your
evaluation data and the data that are presented in evaluations 5 and 6. Important Note: The Evaluations that I have selected are Evalaution
4, which is Program Administartion Scale (PAS), and Evaluation 5, which is NAEYC accreditation decision report. You must read these 2
evaluations and write about them. You must also read evaluation 6, which is NAEYC self-assessment teaching staff survey and evaluation 7,
which is NAEYC self-assessment family survey. You cannot write this paper/order without these documents, and using them in this paper/order.
You must use these documents, and to write this paper. If you do not use these documents the paper/order will be wrong. This is the part
that needs to be addressed, and answered in the body of the paper: Address/ answer these questions in the body of the paper; what the paper
should talk about, what should be in the body of the paper: The content of this paper should talk about and address these
questions/statements • Please remember you are analyzing evaluation 4, 5, 6, and 7. I have given you all the resources you need in order to
do this. Part 1 1. Provide a broader introduction to your evaluation by explaining at least two aspects and/or details about this evaluation
that the “Major Findings” document did not include. For example, you might include information about how the evaluation is scored, average
scores across a specific demographic region, and/or how this evaluation became prominent in the field of early childhood. 2. Provide at
least one website about this evaluation which your group can use as a resource. Part 2 1. Describe the major findings that you analyzed,
including the stakeholders for whom the data were obtained and/or focused. Using the information garnered from your evaluation and
evaluations 6 and 7: o 2. Describe what you perceive to be program strengths. 3. Describe what you perceive to be opportunities for
improvement. 4. Explain how effective the might program be and why. Support your analysis with specific references to evaluation data and
the evaluation’s scoring and/or rating scale. You must only use the resources I uploaded for you to complete this order. If you do not the
finished paper/product will not make sense and it will be wrong. This order is very specific to the Evaluation Data I gave you and the
Connor street scenario, and other documents I gave you. So, please make sure you follow all instructions as I have given them to you
Resources and Material to use for this paper/Order: Why do you not use the resources/materials I upload for you??? You have to use the
resources/materials I upload for you. Please use the materials I upload to write my papers, and use them in in-text citations and on list
them on the reference page. My instructor wants the resources/materials he assigns to use to be used to write our papers. Please use only
the resources/materials I upload/give to you to write my papers. It is extremely important that you follow this instruction. I lose points
from my grade if the resources that I give you to write my papers are not used. You have everything you need to write my paper, you do not
need to use other resources. Also: Please make sure you write this paper using proper sentence structure, proper grammar and punctuation.
And make sure the choice of vocabulary is that of a PHD level status. And no run on sentences or circular sentences, repeating the same
thing using different words. It needs to be clear, concise and easy to read. This is extremely important, that you need to make sure it can
be read without having to edit it too much for I submit it. Format for this paper: It is to be written in APA 6th edition style. Here are
the instructions: 1. Please use 12 Font, no shading, Times New Roman. 2. Double space between sentences. Please NO SPACE(0) between
paragraphs. 3. It needs to be indented only a half an inch (1/2) when you start a new paragraph 4. Please write the references that you use
for in text citation correctly. 5. Please write the references that you use to write my papers on the reference page correctly. Do Not list
references on the reference page that are not used in the content of the paper. 6. Please look at APA style 6th edition and it will show you
how to do it correctly. Thank you and if you need anything else from me, please do not hesitate to send me a message.
