Ethical and legal issues

Sample Solution

The Tarasoff Case: A Turning Point in Patient Confidentiality

On October 27, 1969, Tatiana Tarasoff, a student at the University of California, Berkeley, met with Dr. Lawrence Warren, a psychologist at the university's health center. During their session, Tarasoff disclosed that she was fearful of a fellow student, Prosenjit Poddar, with whom she had previously ended a romantic relationship. She confided in Dr. Warren that Poddar had been making threats and expressed her concern that he might harm her.

Ethical and Legal Issues:

Dr. Warren, bound by patient confidentiality, did not take any immediate action to warn Tarasoff or anyone else about the potential danger. Tragically, two months later, Poddar shot and killed Tarasoff.

This incident sparked a landmark legal case, Tarasoff v. Regents of University of California (1976). The Tarasoff family sued the university, arguing that Dr. Warren's failure to warn Tarasoff or take steps to protect her constituted negligence.

The court established a precedent known as the "duty to warn":

• Duty to warn: Mental health professionals have a legal and ethical obligation to warn potential victims of threats made by their patients when there is a serious threat of violence and the identity of the intended victim is known.

Full Answer Section

The case also introduced the concept of the "duty to protect":

• Duty to protect: In some circumstances, mental health professionals may have a legal obligation to take additional steps to protect the potential victim, such as notifying law enforcement or involuntary hospitalization. However, this is a complex area with strict legal and ethical guidelines.

Example of Duty to Warn:

A therapist treating a patient who expresses intent to harm a specific individual has a duty to warn that individual or take steps to prevent the harm.

Example of Duty to Protect:

A therapist treating a patient experiencing suicidal ideation might have a duty to protect the patient by involving law enforcement or initiating involuntary hospitalization depending on the severity of the situation and relevant regulations.

Current Status in your state:

It's crucial to consult legal resources specific to your state to determine the current legal framework surrounding the duty to warn and duty to protect. These can be complex legal matters with evolving standards, and relying on information specific to your location is essential.

Please note: This article provides a general overview of the Tarasoff case and the legal concepts it introduced. It's not a substitute for legal advice, and you should always consult with a qualified professional regarding specific situations and applicable laws.