Ethical scenarios

  Janet knew that her argument was really weak. She kept looking at the data trying to find a way around the weakness. Finally, it hit her. She realized that she could hide the weakest part of her argument in a really complex presentation aid. If the people can’t understand it, they can’t use it against me, she thought to herself. While she was nervous during her presentation, she was confident that no one would notice what she did. Thankfully, at the end of her presentation, everyone applauded. During the question and answer period that followed, no one questioned the weak information. In fact, no one seemed to even remember the presentation aid at all. 1. Is hiding weak information in a complex presentation aid ethical? 2. Are complex aids that don’t lead to audience understanding ever ethical? 3. If you were Janet’s boss and you found out what she had done, would you think she was an unethical person or just a good, albeit manipulative, speaker?  

Sample Solution

   

No, hiding weak information in a complex presentation aid is not ethical. It is a form of deception, and it is unfair to the audience. When you give a presentation, you have a responsibility to be honest and transparent with your audience. You should not try to hide or mislead them, especially when it comes to important information.

In Janet's case, she was trying to hide the weakest part of her argument in a complex presentation aid. She knew that her argument was weak, and she was worried that the audience would use it against her. However, instead of trying to improve her argument, she decided to deceive the audience by hiding the weak part of her argument in a complex presentation aid.

Full Answer Section

     

This is unethical because it prevents the audience from making informed decisions. If the audience had known about the weak part of Janet's argument, they might have been less likely to agree with her. However, because Janet hid the weak part of her argument, the audience was not able to make an informed decision.

2. Are complex aids that don’t lead to audience understanding ever ethical?

Complex aids that don't lead to audience understanding are not ethical. The purpose of a presentation aid is to help the audience understand the speaker's message. If a presentation aid is too complex or confusing, it will not achieve its purpose. In fact, it may even have the opposite effect, making the audience less likely to understand the speaker's message.

In Janet's case, she used a complex presentation aid to hide the weakest part of her argument. The presentation aid was so complex that no one in the audience understood it. This means that the presentation aid did not achieve its purpose of helping the audience understand Janet's message. In fact, it may have even had the opposite effect, making the audience less likely to understand Janet's message.

3. If you were Janet’s boss and you found out what she had done, would you think she was an unethical person or just a good, albeit manipulative, speaker?

If I were Janet's boss and I found out what she had done, I would think that she was an unethical person. She deliberately deceived her audience by hiding weak information in a complex presentation aid. This is a serious ethical violation.

It is true that Janet is a good speaker. She is able to persuade her audience even when she is giving a weak argument. However, this does not excuse her unethical behavior. She should be held accountable for her actions.

Conclusion

Hiding weak information in a complex presentation aid is unethical. It is a form of deception, and it is unfair to the audience. Complex aids that don't lead to audience understanding are also unethical. If you find yourself in a situation where you are tempted to do either of these things, it is important to remember that it is not worth it. It is always better to be honest and transparent with your audience.

IS IT YOUR FIRST TIME HERE? WELCOME

USE COUPON "11OFF" AND GET 11% OFF YOUR ORDERS