Experimental Analysis
Sample Solution
Functional Behavior Assessment (FBA) - Brief Functional Analysis
Part 1: Selecting the Experimental Analysis
Chosen Method: Brief Functional Analysis (BFA)
Benefits:
- Efficiency: Takes less time compared to full FA, making it quicker to identify potential maintaining factors.
- Feasibility: Easier to implement in real-world settings with limited resources or time constraints.
Full Answer Section
- Reduced Disruption: Minimizes disruption to the individual's routine by keeping the number of conditions lower.
Limitations:
- Less Precise: May not pinpoint the exact function of the behavior as comprehensively as a full FA.
- Potential Inaccuracy: Results may be inconclusive if the BFA doesn't capture all relevant variables.
Rationale for Choosing BFA:
Considering the compassionate approach outlined in the Capella Compassion Code, a BFA is a suitable choice for the following reasons:
- Reduces Strain: A shorter assessment minimizes stress and disruption for the individual being observed.
- Faster Intervention: A quicker assessment allows for swifter implementation of appropriate interventions if problem behaviors are identified.
- Compassionate Focus: Minimizing the number of conditions allows the BFA to prioritize understanding the individual's perspective and needs.
Part 2: Describe the Experimental Analysis
Target Behavior: Tantrums in a 5-year-old child occurring during playtime at daycare.
Suspected Functions: Attention-seeking or escape from an undesired activity.
Conditions:
- Baseline: Observe the frequency and duration of tantrums during regular playtime without intervention.
- Attention: Provide increased positive attention (praise, high fives) when the child plays calmly, ignoring the tantrum behavior.
- Demand: Modify playtime activities to be more age-appropriate and engaging, reducing demands that might trigger tantrums.
Rationale for Compassionate Considerations:
- The BFA conditions are designed to be age-appropriate and focus on reinforcing positive behaviors rather than solely punishing tantrums.
- The observer will be trained to maintain a calm and supportive demeanor throughout the assessment.
Part 3: Display Hypothetical Data and Interpret Results
Graph: A line graph will be used to display the frequency of tantrums observed in each condition (baseline, attention, demand).
Hypothetical Data:
- Baseline: 5 tantrums per hour
- Attention: 3 tantrums per hour
- Demand: 1 tantrum per hour
Interpretation:
The decrease in tantrum frequency across conditions suggests a potential function related to attention-seeking or escape from demands. The behavior decreased with increased positive attention and when demands were modified, indicating these factors may be influencing the tantrums.
Part 4: Conclusion
Based on the results of the BFA, a tentative hypothesis can be formed that the child's tantrums might be a function of seeking attention or escaping from undesired activities. Further interventions can be tailored to address these potential functions, such as providing positive reinforcement for desired behaviors and ensuring playtime activities are engaging and age-appropriate. It is important to note that this BFA is a starting point, and further assessment or a full FA might be necessary depending on the results and the complexity of the behavior.
This BFA prioritizes compassionate approaches by minimizing disruption and focusing on identifying ways to support the child's needs within their environment.