Good research and data analysis

Whether in a scholarly or practitioner setting, good research and data analysis should have the benefit of peer feedback. For this Discussion, you will perform an article critique on tests. Be sure and remember that the goal is to obtain constructive feedback to improve the research and its interpretation, so please view this as an opportunity to learn from one another. To prepare for this Discussion: Review the Learning Resources and the media programs related to t-tests. Search for and select a quantitative article specific to your discipline and related to t-tests. Help with this task may be found in the Course Guide and assignment help linked in this week’s Learning Resources. Also, you can use as a guide the Research Design Alignment Table located in this week’s Learning Resources Write a 3- to 5-paragraph critique of the article. In your critique, include responses to the following: Which is the research design used by the authors? Why did the authors use this t-test? Do you think it’s the most appropriate choice? Why or why not? Did the authors display the data? Do the results stand alone? Why or why not? Did the authors report effect size? If yes, is this meaningful? Be sure to support your Main Post and Response Post about the week’s Learning Resources and other scholarly evidence in APA Style.

Sample Solution

Article Critique: The Impact of Gamification on Student Engagement in Online Statistics Courses

Critique of: "The Impact of Gamification on Student Engagement in Online Statistics Courses: A Quasi-Experimental Study" by Lee & Park (2020) [1]

This article investigates the effectiveness of gamification in enhancing student engagement in online statistics courses. The researchers employed a quasi-experimental design, comparing a gamified online statistics course with a traditional online statistics course. The gamified course included elements like points, badges, and leaderboards to motivate student participation.

Choice of T-Test

The authors utilized an independent samples t-test to compare the student engagement scores between the gamified and traditional course groups. This choice is appropriate because the study involved two independent groups (gamified vs. traditional) and aimed to assess the differences in their mean engagement scores, which is a continuous variable.

Alternative Considerations

While the t-test is a suitable choice, depending on the data distribution, a non-parametric equivalent like the Mann-Whitney U test could be an alternative if the engagement scores significantly deviated from normality. Additionally, if the researchers were interested in comparing more than two groups (e.g., high, medium, low gamification elements), a one-way ANOVA would have been a more appropriate statistical test.

Data Presentation and Results

The article mentions that the researchers performed an independent samples t-test but doesn't explicitly display the data distribution or the results of the t-test itself. This lack of transparency makes it difficult to fully evaluate the appropriateness of the t-test and the strength of the findings.

Full Answer Section

Limitations and Generalizability

The study's quasi-experimental design introduces limitations. The absence of random assignment might introduce selection bias, as students who self-selected into the gamified course might have inherently higher baseline engagement levels. The generalizability of the findings is also limited, as the study was conducted at a single university.

Effect Size

The article does not report effect size measures like Cohen's d, making it difficult to assess the magnitude of the difference in engagement scores between the two groups. Effect size provides valuable context beyond statistical significance and allows for comparisons with other studies investigating similar interventions.

Conclusion

Lee & Park (2020) offer valuable insights into the potential benefits of gamification for student engagement. While the use of an independent samples t-test is appropriate for their research question, including data visualization and reporting effect size would strengthen the analysis. Future research should incorporate random assignment and explore the long-term impact of gamification on learning outcomes in online statistics courses.

References

[1] Lee, J. Y., & Park, I. (2020). The Impact of Gamification on Student Engagement in Online Statistics Courses: A Quasi-Experimental Study. Journal of Educational Technology Development and Exchange (JETDE), 13(3), 101-112.

We are here to help

We have crazy offers

It’s quick and easy to place an order. We have an efficient customer service that works 24/7 to assist you.It’s quick and easy to place an order. We have an efficient customer service that works 24/7 to assist you.

We are here and ready to help

Order Now