HANDLING TOUGH DECISIONS IN THE WORKPLACE
Full Answer Section
I felt that hiking up the price was greedy and would rip off our customers. It also went against the company's values of being fair and ethical. I argued that we should price the product to generate a 40% return, which was an average return for the company's products. The leadership team was initially reluctant to agree with me, but I was able to convince them by making the following points:- Hiking up the price would damage our reputation and make it difficult to attract and retain customers in the long term.
- It would also make it difficult to compete with other companies that were offering similar products at lower prices.
- By pricing the product fairly, we could generate a sustainable profit without ripping off our customers.
- Customer satisfaction: I believe that customer satisfaction is essential for any business to succeed. If we hike up the price of our product, we are essentially saying that we don't care about our customers and that we are only interested in making a profit. This is not a sustainable business model in the long term.
- Fairness: I believe that it is important to be fair to our customers and to our competitors. By hiking up the price of our product, we would be taking advantage of our customers and making it difficult for our competitors to compete. This is not fair or ethical behavior.
- Reputation: A company's reputation is one of its most valuable assets. It takes time and effort to build a good reputation, but it can be destroyed very quickly. By hiking up the price of our product, we would be damaging our reputation and making it difficult to trust us in the future.
Sample Solution
Difficult work-related decision
One of the most difficult work-related decisions I ever had to make was when I was working as a product manager at a tech company. We had developed a new product that was in high demand, and the leadership team was leaning towards hiking up the price to generate a 300% return on each sale. I was the only one on the team who voiced disapproval of this approach.