How human rights organizations and terrorist organizations respond to globalization
The term "globalisation" is used to describe a variety of economic, cultural, social, and political changes that have shaped the world over the past 50-odd years, from the much celebrated revolution in information technology to the diminishing of national and geo-political boundaries in an ever-expanding, transnational movement of goods, services, and capital. The increasing homogenisation of consumer tastes, the consolidation and expansion of corporate power, sharp increases in wealth and poverty, the "McDonaldisation" of food and culture, and the growing ubiquity of liberal democratic ideas are all, in one way or another, attributed to globalisation1.
Shalmali Guttal
Globalization thus brings new opportunities and challenges to citizens in states throughout the globe and makes resources available to actors in domestic political and social struggles. Thus far this quarter, through the readings and in lecture, we have explored the meaning of human rights and terrorism, the import and impact of state sovereignty and communication, the three generations of human rights and the five waves of terrorism and, the emergence of different types of human rights and terrorist organizations.
Discuss how human rights organizations and terrorist organizations respond to globalization and the changing understanding of human rights and terrorism (including the generations of rights and waves of terrorism) to challenge the behavior of states and the norms of the state system. Remember to discuss the paradox of sovereignty for both human rights and terrorist organizations and to explore how globalization influences these organizations’ ability to interact with both domestic and global governments and publics.
Sample Solution
Globalization presents a complex landscape for both human rights organizations and terrorist groups. Here's an analysis of their responses to this evolving world order:
Human Rights Organizations:
- Leveraging Globalization: Human rights groups utilize globalization to amplify their voices and expose abuses. The internet and social media allow them to document human rights violations and garner international support, pressuring states to comply with established standards.
- Challenging Sovereignty: Human rights organizations often challenge the traditional concept of absolute state sovereignty. They argue that human rights are universal and states have a responsibility to protec
Full Answer Section
- Third Generation Rights: Globalization promotes a focus on third-generation human rights, such as the right to development and a clean environment. These rights sometimes conflict with state interests, creating tension.
- Paradox of Sovereignty: Human rights organizations rely on state cooperation for access and impact but simultaneously advocate for limitations on state power to protect citizens. This creates a delicate balance.
- Capitalizing on Globalization: Terrorist groups exploit globalization by using the internet for propaganda, recruitment, and fundraising. They can also leverage the ease of international travel to carry out attacks across borders.
- Erosion of Sovereignty: Terrorism highlights the limitations of state sovereignty. Attacks can occur anywhere, and terrorist networks can operate across borders, challenging the ability of individual states to manage threats.
- Fourth and Fifth Waves of Terrorism: Globalization facilitates the rise of new waves of terrorism, like those driven by globalization itself or cyberterrorism.
- Paradox of Sovereignty: Terrorist organizations exploit weaknesses in state sovereignty but also seek to establish their own sovereign territory or influence. This creates a conflicting relationship with existing states.
- Increased Interaction: Globalization creates opportunities for both human rights organizations and terrorist groups to interact with domestic and global audiences through media and advocacy efforts.
- Shifting Norms: The evolving understanding of human rights and terrorism necessitates adaptation for both sides. Human rights groups advocate for expanding rights frameworks, while terrorist groups adapt their tactics based on changing perceptions.