Humanizing immigrants – does it work?

Published by admin3 on September 23, 2019

Tags

Humanizing immigrants – does it work?

Intro – what the course is about, and who we are. What are “mainstream media”?
Reading:
https://remote.baruch.cuny.edu/login?url=http://link.galegroup.com/apps/doc/A589848353/AONE?u=cuny_baruch&sid=AONE&xid=cd8787b3

Week 2: (Sept. 3): Media Criticism: Establishing criteria for evaluation and criticism of the news media. What should we look at? How can we be fair? Building
benchmarks for balance of the semester. Guest: Betsy Morais, Managing Editor, Columbia Journalism Review.
Mills/JRN 3050/Page 5

Readings:
• https://www.cjr.org/special_report/race-ethnicity-newsrooms-data.php
o https://www.cjr.org/special_report/black-press.php
o https://www.cjr.org/special_report/as-you-like-it.php
o https://www.cjr.org/special_report/venezuela-news-internet.php
o https://www.niemanlab.org/2017/12/a-responsible-press-criticism/
o https://niemanreports.org/articles/media-criticism-journalism-vs-advocacy/
o https://www.nytimes.com/2016/10/17/business/media/criticism-of-the-news-media-takes-on-a-more-sinister-tone.html
Resources:
o https://www.politico.com/news/media-criticism
o https://fair.org/topic/media-criticism/
o https://www.aim.org/

Week 3 (Sept. 10): Think Tanks, Lobbying and Campaign Finance
Readings:
Resources:
Think tanks
o https://guides.library.harvard.edu/hks/think_tank_search/US
o https://guides.lib.berkeley.edu/c.php?g=496970&p=3427170
o https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List of_think_tanks_in_the_United_States
Some of the best-known think tanks in the U.S.:
• The Hoover Institution: http://www.hoover.org/
• The Brookings Institution: http://www.brookings.edu/
• The Rand Corporation: http://www.rand.org/
• The Urban Institute: http://www.urban.org/
• The American Enterprise Institute: http://www.aei.org/
• The James A. Baker III Institute for Public Policy: http://riceinfo.rice.edu/projects/baker
• Cato Institute: http://www.cato.org/
• Heritage Foundation: http://www.heritage.org/
Lobbying
o https://www.opensecrets.org/news/2018/10/lobbying-spending-at-highest-levels-since-2010/
Mills/JRN 3050/Page 6

o https://journalistsresource.org/studies/politics/finance-lobbying/influence-interest-groups-public-policy-outcomes/
o http://www.oecd.org/cleangovbiz/toolkit/50101671.pdf

Election finance laws
o https://www.opensecrets.org/news/2019/06/2020-democrats-stands-on-campaign-finance/
o https://journalistsresource.org/studies/politics/finance-lobbying/writing-campaign-finance-tip-sheet-tools-examples/
o https://www.fec.gov/press/resources-journalists/

Week 4 (Sept. 17): Immigration Guest: Julianne Welby, WNYC
Readings:
Resources:
https://www.journaliststoolbox.org/2019/08/16/covering-immigration/
https://www.migrationpolicy.org/data/unauthorized-immigrant-population/state/US
https://journalistsresource.org/studies/government/immigration/
https://www.urban.org/experts/immigrants-and-immigration

Week 5 (Sept. 24) Political coverage: Guest: Greg Birnbaum, politics editor, NBCNews.com

Immigration Readings from WNYC
Questions for Juliane Welby:
• How long on this beat?
• How many reporters involved in immig coverage?
o Growing?
o Freelance as well as staff?
• What do reporters bring to this?
o Prior knowledge of immig matters
o Multilingual or multicultural backgrounds?
• Who is the competition for WNYC – is there any news org that you have a sense of competing against directly? NYT? Daily News? NY1?

Https://www.wnyc.org/story/presiding-under-pressure/
• Backlog of 900,000 cases – not enough judges? Hearings now scheduled into ‘23
• Impartial – many new judges used to work for ICE or Justice
• No interviews or direct comment from proponents of the system? Critics quoted. Is this article balanced, or of only one point of view?
(This one is third of 3 in a series. Links are provided at top of this page)
https://www.wnyc.org/story/once-separated-from-mom-now-studying-help-other-immigrant-kids
• A profile, very sympathetic. Do we get a sense of whether she is typical – like, why profile her?
• Is it balanaced? Is there another side to this story

And a couple of lighter ones that I know my reporters enjoyed creating:
https://gothamist.com/news/orange-is-the-new-black-fact-check-immigration
• Good story? Should we accept that fiction dramas are documentary-accurate?
o Newsroom
o All the President’s Men
o Breaking Bad
• Is the story weaker because it has no comment from ICE? Should publication await that comment?
• Did this story originate with the reporter or an editor?

https://www.wnyc.org/story/with-subway-ride-trump-carousel-syrian-refugees-tour-new-york/
• Humanizing immigrants – does it work?
• Does reporter speak Arabic, or is all this done through translator? Does this make a diff to WNYC?

Questions for class/Talking points
• Are there two sides to this story – do we hear both of them?
• Is immigration coverage overall fair – does a look at major news org provide a balanced picture?
• Do we hear enough from supports of Govt policies? Do we hear enough from critics?
• If you were designing and then recruiting an immigration team of reporters and editors, what criteria would you use?
o Balance
o Fairness
o Represent diff points of view
o Language skills
o Knowledge of issues
• Watch excellent video (in syll)
https://www.youtube.com/watch?time_continue=1&v=aongjvQ-QCE
(from Ethical Journalism Network – only 760 subscribers?)
• If you’re reporting on undocumented people, do you risk outing them?

And this shows many good story ideas and approaches:
https://journalistsresource.org/studies/government/immigration/

Resources:
https://www.journaliststoolbox.org/2019/08/16/covering-immigration/
https://www.migrationpolicy.org/data/unauthorized-immigrant-population/state/US
https://journalistsresource.org/studies/government/immigration/
https://www.urban.org/experts/immigrants-and-immigration

https://dartcenter.org/content/reporting-immigration-beat
long, slow, many good points – 4 white journalists talking about immigration coverage.

BRIEF DISCUSSION OF THINK TANKS
See https://www.google.com/search?q=cato+institute&rlz=1C1CHBF_enUS794US794&oq=cato&aqs=chrome.1.69i57j0l5.2600j0j4&sourceid=chrome&ie=UTF-8
• Go to heritage.org and search for immigration
o Among topics under national security
o Read through this in class
▪ https://www.heritage.org/immigration/heritage-explains/what-immigration-reform-should-look
• Go to AEI.org and search for immigration
o http://www.aei.org/?s=immigration
• Go to Brookings.edu and search for immigration
o http://www.aei.org/?s=immigration

Compelling correspondence is essential to the achievement all things considered but since of the changing idea of the present working environments, successful correspondence turns out to be more troublesome, and because of the numerous impediments that will permit beneficiaries to acknowledge the plan of the sender It is restricted. Misguided judgments.In spite of the fact that correspondence inside the association is rarely completely open, numerous straightforward arrangements can be executed to advance the effect of these hindrances.

Concerning specific contextual analysis, two significant correspondence standards, correspondence channel determination and commotion are self-evident. This course presents the standards of correspondence, the act of general correspondence, and different speculations to all the more likely comprehend the correspondence exchanges experienced in regular daily existence. The standards and practices that you learn in this course give the premise to additionally learning and correspondence.

This question has been answered

This course starts with an outline of the correspondence cycle, the method of reasoning and hypothesis. In resulting modules of the course, we will look at explicit use of relational connections in close to home and expert life. These incorporate relational correspondence, bunch correspondence and dynamic, authoritative correspondence in the work environment or relational correspondence. Rule of Business Communication In request to make correspondence viable, it is important to follow a few rules and standards. Seven of them are fundamental and applicable, and these are clear, finished, brief, obliging, right, thought to be, concrete. These standards are frequently called 7C for business correspondence. The subtleties of these correspondence standards are examined underneath: Politeness Principle: When conveying, we should build up a cordial relationship with every individual who sends data to us.

To be inviting and polite is indistinguishable, and politeness requires an insightful and amicable activity against others. Axioms are notable that gracious “pay of graciousness is the main thing to win everything”. Correspondence staff ought to consistently remember this. The accompanying standards may assist with improving courtesy:Preliminary considering correspondence with family All glad families have the mystery of progress. This achievement originates from a strong establishment of closeness and closeness. Indeed, through private correspondence these cozy family connections become all the more intently. Correspondence is the foundation of different affiliations, building solid partners of obedient devotion, improving family way of life, and assisting with accomplishing satisfaction (Gosche, p. 1). In any case, so as to keep up an amicable relationship, a few families experienced tumultuous encounters. Correspondence in the family is an intricate and alluring marvel. Correspondence between families isn’t restricted to single messages between families or verbal correspondence.

It is a unique cycle that oversees force, closeness and limits, cohesiveness and flexibility of route frameworks, and makes pictures, topics, stories, ceremonies, rules, jobs, making implications, making a feeling of family life An intelligent cycle that makes a model. This model has passed ages. Notwithstanding the view as a family and family automatic framework, one of the greatest exploration establishments in between family correspondence centers around a family correspondence model. Family correspondence model (FCP) hypothesis clarifies why families impart in their own specific manner dependent on one another ‘s psychological direction. Early FCP research established in media research is keen on how families handle broad communications data. Family correspondence was perceived as an exceptional scholastic exploration field by the National Communications Association in 1989. Family correspondence researchers were at first impacted by family research, social brain science, and relational hypothesis, before long built up the hypothesis and began research in a family framework zeroed in on a significant job. Until 2001, the primary issue of the Family Communication Research Journal, Family Communication Magazine, was given. Family correspondence is more than the field of correspondence analysts in the family. Examination on family correspondence is normally done by individuals in brain science, humanism, and family research, to give some examples models. However, as the popular family correspondence researcher Leslie Baxter stated, it is the focal point of this intelligent semantic creation measure making the grant of family correspondence special. In the field of in-home correspondence, correspondence is normally not founded on autonomous messages from one sender to one beneficiary, yet dependent on the dynamic interdependency of data shared among families It is conceptualized. The focal point of this methodology is on the shared trait of semantic development inside family frameworks. As such, producing doesn’t happen in vacuum, however it happens in a wide scope of ages and social exchange.

Standards are rules end up being followed when performing work to agree to a given objective. Hierarchical achievement relies significantly upon compelling correspondence. So as to successfully impart, it is important to follow a few standards and rules. Coming up next are rules to guarantee powerful correspondence: clearness: lucidity of data is a significant guideline of correspondence. For beneficiaries to know the message plainly, the messages ought to be sorted out in a basic language. To guarantee that beneficiaries can without much of a stretch comprehend the importance of the message, the sender needs to impart unmistakably and unhesitatingly so the beneficiary can plainly and unquestionably comprehend the data.>

Humanizing immigrants – does it work?

Sample Answer

IS IT YOUR FIRST TIME HERE? WELCOME