Information Systems

Sample Solution

UDP Port Numbers: Advantages, Disadvantages, and Alternatives

Advantages:

• Efficiency: No need for connection setup and teardown; reduces handshake overhead.
• Simplicity: Easier to implement and manage compared to dynamic port allocation.
• Broadcast/Multicast: Preassigned ports enable efficient communication for applications like news feeds or video streaming.
• Firewall configuration: Simplifies firewall rules by identifying specific services based on port numbers.

Disadvantages:

• Security: Well-known port numbers are prone to scans and attacks targeting specific services.
• Port exhaustion: Limited number of ports can lead to conflicts if not managed carefully.
• Limited flexibility: Static assignment reduces adaptability to dynamic network environments.

Full Answer Section

Alternatives:

• Ephemeral ports: Dynamically assigned ports for each communication, improving security but adding complexity.
• Service discovery protocols: Dynamically identify services by name or description, reducing reliance on specific ports.

Protocol Ports vs. Process Identifiers: Advantages and Considerations

Advantages of Protocol Ports:

• Standardization: Port numbers are globally recognized, simplifying communication across different systems.
• Abstraction: Decouples applications from specific processes, enabling flexibility and scalability.
• Multiple services on a machine: Allows multiple applications to run on the same machine using different ports.

Considerations:

• Security: Similar to UDP port numbers, well-known protocol ports are vulnerable to targeted attacks.
• Performance: Port translation for communication across networks can introduce additional overhead.

Reliable Datagram Protocol with Timeouts and Acknowledgments

Mechanisms:

• Sequence numbers: Assign unique sequence numbers to each datagram to identify missing or out-of-order packets.
• Timeouts: Sender sets a timer for each datagram. If no acknowledgment is received within the timeout, resend the datagram.
• Acknowledgments: Receiver sends acknowledgments confirming receipt of datagrams, allowing the sender to track progress.

Overhead and Delay:

• Increased packet size: Sequence numbers and acknowledgments add overhead to each datagram.
• Retransmission delays: Timeouts and retransmissions can introduce delays if packets are lost.

Trade-off: Reliability comes at the cost of increased complexity, overhead, and potential delays. The optimal balance depends on specific application requirements.

TCP Stream Sequence Numbers and Handling Arbitrary Length Streams

TCP Sequence Numbers:

• 32-bit sequence numbers used for byte-level addressing within a stream.
• Sequence numbers wrap around after reaching the maximum value, but the initial sequence number (ISN) ensures uniqueness.
• Each byte in the stream receives a unique sequence number, allowing tracking and reassembly of arbitrary lengths.

Detailed protocol specifications can vary, but the key principle is using relative byte offsets within the stream instead of absolute positions.

Lost TCP Acknowledgments and Retransmissions

TCP's congestion control mechanisms:

• Slow start and congestion avoidance algorithms dynamically adjust sending rate based on network conditions.
• Acknowledgments trigger further data transmission, while missing acknowledgments trigger timeouts and retransmissions.

Why lost acknowledgments might not force immediate retransmissions:

• Network delays: Lost acknowledgments could be due to temporary network delays, not necessarily packet loss.
• Fast retransmission: TCP uses duplicate acknowledgments and other heuristics to differentiate between actual losses and delayed acknowledgments.
• Congestion avoidance: Retransmitting immediately could exacerbate congestion if the lost acknowledgment was due to network congestion.

Therefore, TCP balances the need for timely retransmission with avoiding unnecessary network congestion.

Arguments for and Against Automatically Closing Idle Connections

Arguments for:

• Resource conservation: Reduces server load and frees up resources for other connections.
• Security: Mitigates vulnerabilities associated with long-dormant connections.
• Stability: Prevents lingering half-closed connections from causing issues.

Arguments against:

• Performance: Frequent connection establishment can introduce overhead and latency.
• User experience: Disrupts ongoing communication if users expect the connection to remain open.
• Application requirements: Some applications might require long-lived connections for periodic updates or monitoring.

Ultimately, the decision depends on specific application requirements, resource constraints, and user experience considerations.

TCP Initial Sequence Number and System Crash Confusion

Scenario:

1. System crashes with existing TCP connection open.
2. System restarts and initiates a new connection with the same source port.
3. Remote system might receive packets with the same initial sequence number, mistaking it for the old connection.

Confusion is mitigated by:

• ISN prediction: Remote system predicts the next expected sequence number based on previous communication.
• SYN flag in initial packet: New connection attempts use the SYN flag to distinguish themselves from old connections.
• Timeouts and retransmissions: If confusion occurs, timeouts and retransmissions