International Financial Reporting Standards (IFRS) and US Generally Accepted Accounting Principles

      analyze the differences in reporting specific transactions between International Financial Reporting Standards (IFRS) and US Generally Accepted Accounting Principles (GAAP) Based on your research, evaluate the convergence process between IFRS and US GAAP on financial reporting as it relates to U.S. companies in emerging markets.    

Sample Solution

  International Financial Reporting Standards (IFRS) and US Generally Accepted Accounting Principles (GAAP) are the two most widely used sets of accounting standards in the world. However, there are some key differences between the two standards, particularly in how they account for specific transactions. Here are some examples of the differences between IFRS and GAAP in reporting specific transactions:
  • Goodwill: IFRS requires companies to amortize goodwill over a period of 10 years, while GAAP allows companies to choose between amortizing goodwill over a period of 20 years or not amortizing it at all

Full Answer Section

 
  • Research and development (R&D) expenses: IFRS requires companies to expense R&D expenses as incurred, while GAAP allows companies to capitalize R&D expenses under certain circumstances.
  • Leases: IFRS requires companies to capitalize most leases, while GAAP allows companies to classify certain leases as operating leases.
  • Fair value accounting: IFRS requires companies to use fair value accounting for more assets and liabilities than GAAP does.
These are just a few examples of the differences between IFRS and GAAP in reporting specific transactions. The specific accounting treatment for a particular transaction will depend on the specific facts and circumstances of the transaction, as well as the accounting standards that the company is following. Convergence process between IFRS and US GAAP The convergence process between IFRS and US GAAP is an ongoing effort to bring the two sets of accounting standards closer together. This process is being driven by a number of factors, including the increasing globalization of business and the desire for investors to have access to comparable financial information from companies around the world. The convergence process has been successful in narrowing the gap between IFRS and GAAP in a number of areas. However, there are still some key differences between the two standards, and it is not clear when the convergence process will be completed. Impact of convergence on U.S. companies in emerging markets The convergence of IFRS and GAAP is likely to have a significant impact on U.S. companies that operate in emerging markets. These companies will need to decide whether to adopt IFRS or GAAP, and this decision will have a number of implications for their financial reporting and disclosure practices. Companies that adopt IFRS will be able to access a wider pool of investors, as more investors are familiar with IFRS than GAAP. However, companies that adopt IFRS will also need to comply with more complex accounting rules, and this could increase their compliance costs. Companies that adopt GAAP will be able to continue to use the accounting rules that they are familiar with, but they may have difficulty attracting investors from countries that use IFRS. Ultimately, the decision of whether to adopt IFRS or GAAP is a complex one that should be made on a case-by-case basis. Companies should carefully consider their specific circumstances and needs before making a decision.

IS IT YOUR FIRST TIME HERE? WELCOME

USE COUPON "11OFF" AND GET 11% OFF YOUR ORDERS