Irrelevant Or Relevant Cost

    Explain a situation you have observed (or read about) in which a firm made a decision considering irrelevant costs or did not consider relevant costs. What was the outcome of the decision, and what could have been done differently?

Sample Solution

     

Here's an example of a firm making a decision based on irrelevant costs and neglecting relevant ones:

Case Study: Airline Adds In-Flight Meals

  • Airline: A struggling budget airline known for its low fares decides to add complimentary in-flight meals to compete with established airlines.

  • Irrelevant Cost: The airline's management focused heavily on the upfront cost of purchasing and catering the meals. They viewed this as the primary expense associated with offering in-flight meals.

Full Answer Section

       
  • Neglected Relevant Costs: They failed to consider several significant relevant costs:
    • Increased weight onboard: Meals add weight to the aircraft, impacting fuel efficiency and increasing fuel costs.
    • Labor costs: Additional flight attendants might be needed to serve meals, especially on longer flights.
    • Waste disposal: Food waste disposal at airports adds additional costs.
    • Meal service time: Serving meals can extend turnaround times between flights, potentially causing delays and schedule disruptions.
  • Outcome: The airline experienced a significant increase in operating costs due to the neglected factors. The added costs outweighed any potential gains in ridership, and the airline ultimately had to cut back on the in-flight meal program. Their profit margins remained low, and they lost some customers who were attracted to the initial idea of complimentary meals.
  • What could have been done differently?
    • Comprehensive Cost Analysis: A thorough cost analysis should have considered all relevant costs, including fuel cost increases, labor, waste disposal, and potential delays.
    • Market Research: Researching customer preferences would have shown if budget-conscious travelers truly valued in-flight meals over low fares.
    • Pilot Program: A pilot program on a limited number of flights could have helped assess the actual costs and customer response before a full rollout.
By considering all relevant costs and conducting proper research, the airline could have avoided this costly misstep. They might have chosen alternative strategies to improve customer experience without significantly impacting their profit margins.  

IS IT YOUR FIRST TIME HERE? WELCOME

USE COUPON "11OFF" AND GET 11% OFF YOUR ORDERS