Jeff Savvy is a computer help desk investigator for the University of Vermont (UVM). He learns Jack Hemp has gained unlawful access to UVM’s computer network. It is Final Exam Week. Savvy is concerned that Hemp will “take the UVM Network down.” Can he gain access to Hemp’s computer, which is connected to the UVM Network and located in Hemp’s dorm room, without a search warrant? Please explain your answer.please identify what extra information you need.?
Jeff Savvy is a computer help desk investigator for the University of Vermont (UVM). He learns Jack Hemp has gained unlawful access to UVM’s computer network. It is Final Exam Week. Savvy is concerned that Hemp will “take the UVM Network down.” Can he gain access to Hemp’s computer, which is connected to the UVM Network and located in Hemp’s dorm room, without a search warrant? Please explain your answer.please identify what extra information you need.?
1.Jeff Savvy is a computer help desk investigator for the University of Vermont (UVM). He learns Jack Hemp has gained unlawful access to UVM’s computer network. It is Final Exam Week. Savvy is concerned that Hemp will “take the UVM Network down.” Can he gain access to Hemp’s computer, which is connected to the UVM Network and located in Hemp’s dorm room, without a search warrant? Please explain your answer.please identify what extra information you need.?
2.A’s wife plays a CD that her husband has left by the family computer. She opens one of the files and finds that it is child pornography. She calls her brother Jimmy, a police officer. Can Jimmy look at the CD without a warrant? If so, what can he look at? Please explain your answer.?
3. Investigator Clousseau has a search warrant to search Bobby’s computer for evidence of the crime of “delivery of illegal drugs.” As he searches the computer, Clousseau comes across a spreadsheet file that appears to show that Bobby has been embezzling from his employer. What should Clousseau do? Please explain your answer. ?
4.Courts have held that a person can be charged with a crime in the U.S. even though he never left Russia during the time the crime was committed. Please give an example of how this could happen and explain the courts’ rationale for upholding the charge. ?
5.What is the argument that AOL is acting as a government agent when it “hashes”/ searches subscriber’s files, finds that a file that is “known child pornography” and then reports this fact to the government? Has this argument been accepted by the courts? Please explain your answer.?