The learning objective of this assignment is to explore multiple ways of measuring the same variable, and assess which measurements may be more valid (i.e., accurate) than others. You are required to analyze different measurements of the same variable.
1. Part One –
You must find three scholarly empirical (i.e., the researchers collected data) articles, using the UCF library or Google Scholar
Each article must contain a different method of operationalizing/measuring the same variable (i.e., the concept must be the same but it must be measured differently)
You must choose a variable from the following list:
o Sentencing outcomes
o Juvenile delinquency
o Drug usage (of same drug for all articles)
o Officer discretion
o Prosecutorial discretion
o Some other variable approved by me in writing
In the articles, you will find the measurement information in the Methods section.
o (Hint – If there is no Methods section, it is not an empirical article.)
I recommend that you find your three articles on the same variable before moving to stage two.
2. Part Two – Due Sunday, November 8, 2015 – Compare the three different types of measurement in a 3-5 page paper.
Analyze the three studies and the different ways they measure the same variable you chose. (If they use other variables too, ignore those.)
o You must analyze the three measurements of your variable. To be analytical, you must:
? Report the research question of each study and describe the sample
? Report the method of data collection
? Survey, officially-recorded
? Qualitative or quantitative
? Cross-sectional or longitudinal
? Report whether it was primary or secondary data collection
? Report the definition of the variable according to each source
? If you quote, be sure to include the article’s page number in the APA in-text citation
? Report how each source operationalized the variable (how did they measure it?)
? Be sure to provide examples
? Compare and contrast the definitions and measurements of each source
? Give the reader your opinion as to the best method of measurement.
? You must indicate which method of measurement you find to be the most valid (accurate) for the variable you have chosen, and make sure to include why you believe this to be true.
? Make sure to consider how applicable each measurement was to the research question and data collection procedure
? Additional criteria for the assignment include:
? You must cite the articles in the text using APA format, as well as giving a full APA reference list at the end of the paper.
? The paper must contain a labeled introduction and conclusion.
? The paper should be between 3-5 pages (not including the reference section)
? College level writing is expected, which means correct grammar, spelling, punctuation, etc.
Compelling correspondence is essential to the achievement all things considered but since of the changing idea of the present working environments, successful correspondence turns out to be more troublesome, and because of the numerous impediments that will permit beneficiaries to acknowledge the plan of the sender It is restricted. Misguided judgments.In spite of the fact that correspondence inside the association is rarely completely open, numerous straightforward arrangements can be executed to advance the effect of these hindrances.
Concerning specific contextual analysis, two significant correspondence standards, correspondence channel determination and commotion are self-evident. This course presents the standards of correspondence, the act of general correspondence, and different speculations to all the more likely comprehend the correspondence exchanges experienced in regular daily existence. The standards and practices that you learn in this course give the premise to additionally learning and correspondence.
This course starts with an outline of the correspondence cycle, the method of reasoning and hypothesis. In resulting modules of the course, we will look at explicit use of relational connections in close to home and expert life. These incorporate relational correspondence, bunch correspondence and dynamic, authoritative correspondence in the work environment or relational correspondence. Rule of Business Communication In request to make correspondence viable, it is important to follow a few rules and standards. Seven of them are fundamental and applicable, and these are clear, finished, brief, obliging, right, thought to be, concrete. These standards are frequently called 7C for business correspondence. The subtleties of these correspondence standards are examined underneath: Politeness Principle: When conveying, we should build up a cordial relationship with every individual who sends data to us.
To be inviting and polite is indistinguishable, and politeness requires an insightful and amicable activity against others. Axioms are notable that gracious “pay of graciousness is the main thing to win everything”. Correspondence staff ought to consistently remember this. The accompanying standards may assist with improving courtesy:Preliminary considering correspondence with family All glad families have the mystery of progress. This achievement originates from a strong establishment of closeness and closeness. Indeed, through private correspondence these cozy family connections become all the more intently. Correspondence is the foundation of different affiliations, building solid partners of obedient devotion, improving family way of life, and assisting with accomplishing satisfaction (Gosche, p. 1). In any case, so as to keep up an amicable relationship, a few families experienced tumultuous encounters. Correspondence in the family is an intricate and alluring marvel. Correspondence between families isn’t restricted to single messages between families or verbal correspondence.
It is a unique cycle that oversees force, closeness and limits, cohesiveness and flexibility of route frameworks, and makes pictures, topics, stories, ceremonies, rules, jobs, making implications, making a feeling of family life An intelligent cycle that makes a model. This model has passed ages. Notwithstanding the view as a family and family automatic framework, one of the greatest exploration establishments in between family correspondence centers around a family correspondence model. Family correspondence model (FCP) hypothesis clarifies why families impart in their own specific manner dependent on one another ‘s psychological direction. Early FCP research established in media research is keen on how families handle broad communications data. Family correspondence was perceived as an exceptional scholastic exploration field by the National Communications Association in 1989. Family correspondence researchers were at first impacted by family research, social brain science, and relational hypothesis, before long built up the hypothesis and began research in a family framework zeroed in on a significant job. Until 2001, the primary issue of the Family Communication Research Journal, Family Communication Magazine, was given. Family correspondence is more than the field of correspondence analysts in the family. Examination on family correspondence is normally done by individuals in brain science, humanism, and family research, to give some examples models. However, as the popular family correspondence researcher Leslie Baxter stated, it is the focal point of this intelligent semantic creation measure making the grant of family correspondence special. In the field of in-home correspondence, correspondence is normally not founded on autonomous messages from one sender to one beneficiary, yet dependent on the dynamic interdependency of data shared among families It is conceptualized. The focal point of this methodology is on the shared trait of semantic development inside family frameworks. As such, producing doesn’t happen in vacuum, however it happens in a wide scope of ages and social exchange.
Standards are rules end up being followed when performing work to agree to a given objective. Hierarchical achievement relies significantly upon compelling correspondence. So as to successfully impart, it is important to follow a few standards and rules. Coming up next are rules to guarantee powerful correspondence: clearness: lucidity of data is a significant guideline of correspondence. For beneficiaries to know the message plainly, the messages ought to be sorted out in a basic language. To guarantee that beneficiaries can without much of a stretch comprehend the importance of the message, the sender needs to impart unmistakably and unhesitatingly so the beneficiary can plainly and unquestionably comprehend the data.>