marking criteria for research metrology and data analysis

marking criteria for research metrology and data analysis

20%
the following are missing; • Font size 12 • 1.5 line spacing • Headings and sub-headings • Titles on all charts • References page • Appendices
Written to an acceptable level, is easy to follow but more than 10 spelling and grammar omissions.
BUS 4956 INTEGRATIVE RESEARCH PROJECT
10%
ENGLISH LANGUAGE
10%
APA STYLE REFERENCING AND SAFE ASSIGN
10%
requirements met; • Font size 12 • 1.5 line spacing • Headings and sub-headings • Titles on all charts • References page • Appendices
MARKING CRITERIA FOR RESEARCH METHODOLOGY AND DATA ANALYSIS
following is missing; • Font size 12 • 1.5 line spacing • Headings and sub-headings • Titles on all charts • References page • Appendices
are missing; • Font size 12 • 1.5 line spacing • Headings and sub-headings • Titles on all charts • References page • Appendices
following are missing; • Font size 12 • 1.5 line spacing • Headings and sub-headings • Titles on all charts • References page • Appendices
Uses formal writing, logical flow and appropriate vocabulary. Up to five minor typos
Web vi…,;-itten, flows h between 9 S gr?,,r,7-1,1., omissions.
Well written, flows logically with not more than 10 spelling or grammar omissions
Fully accurate APA formatting used including in-text citations. Safe Assign not more than 10%
accurate APA formatting used including in-text citations. Safe Assign not more than 15%
APA formatting used including in-text citations with occasional omissions or omissions. Safe Assign not more than 20%
Many omissions that seriously affect the flow.
Some attempt made to use APA formatting including in-text citations although omissions are often evident. Safe Assign is more than 25%
APA formatting not used and no in-text citations. Paper not checked using Safe Assign.
Total Final Grade
Student Name/ID/Section

BUS 4956 INTEGRATIVE RESEARCH PROJECT Data
10%
explanation of the chosen data analysis method provided. The explanation /analysis of each set of data presented is full and descriptive. At least two relevant advanced statistical tools have been used appropriately.
2
MARKING CRITERIA FOR RESEARCH METHODOLOGY AND DATA ANALYSIS chosen data analysis made to explain the been made to explain the method provided. chosen data analysis chosen data analysis The explanation/analysis method. There is a simple method. The explanation of each set of data and mostly clear / analysis of each set of presented is clear. The explanation/ analysis of data is very simple with use of one advanced each set of data not much detail. No statistical tool is accurate presented. Some attempt advanced statistical tools and relevant. has been made to use an used. advanced statistical tool.
200
explanation of the chosen data analysis method. There is almost no explanation/analysis of the data. No advanced statistical tools used.
Conclusion
Final summary regarding the success and appropriateness of the data collection methods, tools and the analysis in relation to the research question and the proposed integration of CLOs in the proposal.
10%
A fully descriptive explanation of why these chosen data collection methods and data analysis tools have been used to support the coverage of the CLOs and research question(s)
A clear explanation of why these chosen data collec1:n methods and date ,W,alysis tools have been ,ised to support the coverage of the CLOs and research question(s)
A simple description of why these chosen data collection methods and data analysis tools have been used to support the coverage of the CLOs and research question(s)
Very little attempt to explain why these chosen data collection methods and data analysis tools have been used to support the coverage of the CLOs and research question(s)
There is almost no explanation of why these chosen data collection methods and data analysis tools have been used to support the coverage of the CLOs and research question(s)
APPENDICES to include:
Evidence of primary data collection includes interview questions, questionnaires, survey questions with responses.
Evidence of secondary research is provided in the References 10%
STRUCTURE AND FORMAT
Fully detailed evidence of primary data collection. More than 10 interviews conducted. The number of questionnaires and surveys completed had prior approval. Evidence of secondary research is shown in the References.
Paper is professionally formatted using the HCT guidelines with all of the
Most of the evidence of primary data collection is clear. Between 5 and 10 interviews conducted. The number of questionnaires and surveys completed had prior approval. Evidence of secondary research is shown in the References.
Some evidence of primary data collection included. At least 5 interviews conducted. The number of questionnaires and surveys completed did not received prior approval. Evidence of secondary research is shown in the References.
Incomplete evidence of primary data collection included. Less than 5 interviews conducted. The number of questionnaires and surveys completed did not received prior approval. Evidence of secondary research is shown in the References.
Only one or two samples of primary data collection included. The number of questionnaires and surveys completed did not received prior approval. Evidence of secondary research is shown in the References.
Paper is professionally formatted using the HCT guidelines but one of the
Niki Dancy 201510
Paper is not formatted using the HCT guidelines and two of the following
Paper is not formatted using the HCT guidelines and three of the
Paper is not formatted using the HCT guidelines and more than three of