While case managers do not normally sit around discussing which model or method of case planning they are using, any good project or program determines early on which methods or models make the most sense for the work they are engaging in. To practice case management, practice applying these models and methods to realistic situations to explore the impact of choosing one method over another.
Imagine you are developing your own human services agency for clients reentering the community after incarceration. You must determine an effective case management model and present it to your stakeholders.
Write a 550-word essay for your human services agency that describes the best case management model for your population.
For your proposal you should:
Identify the population your agency will serve.
Describe the types of services the agency will provide.
Identify any potential barriers to care faced by the population served.
Compare 2 case management models and propose the model you believe will best serve this population.
Justify your selection with research on how this model can assist this population.
Provide an example of how a human services worker would provide services using this model.
Sample Solution
Client Population: Our human services agency will serve adults returning to the community after incarceration, encompassing individuals with diverse backgrounds and criminal histories. This includes individuals previously convicted of non-violent and violent offenses, with varying lengths of incarceration and support systems.
Services Offered: We will provide holistic services promoting successful reintegration, focusing on five key areas:
- Housing and Financial Stability: Assisting with secure housing options, financial literacy training, and employment readiness programs.
Full Answer Section
- Mental and Physical Health: Offering access to mental health services, substance abuse treatment, and healthcare resources.
- Education and Training: Facilitating access to educational opportunities, vocational training, and job placement assistance.
- Legal Assistance and Advocacy: Connecting clients with legal aid, navigating parole systems, and promoting civic engagement.
- Social Support and Community Connections: Building peer support networks, fostering family relationships, and facilitating reintegration into the community.
Barriers to Care: This population faces numerous barriers to care, including:
- Stigma and discrimination: Difficulty obtaining housing, employment, and social acceptance due to criminal records.
- Limited financial resources: Lack of savings, income instability, and challenges accessing government benefits.
- Mental health and substance abuse issues: High prevalence of untreated mental health conditions and substance abuse dependencies.
- Limited social support networks: Strained family relationships, lack of positive mentorship, and social isolation.
- Inadequate access to services: Limited awareness of available resources and challenges navigating complex social service systems.
Comparing Case Management Models: We've considered two major case management models for our agency:
-
Traditional Deficit-Based Model: This model focuses on identifying client problems and deficiencies, developing corrective plans, and monitoring progress towards predetermined goals. While structured and goal-oriented, it can be perceived as top-down and disempowering, potentially discouraging client engagement and reinforcing negative self-perceptions.
-
Strengths-Based Model: This model emphasizes existing client strengths, resources, and skills, building upon them to address challenges and achieve self-defined goals. It promotes client autonomy, fosters collaboration, and instills a sense of hope and self-efficacy. Research suggests it can lead to improved engagement, goal attainment, and overall well-being in reentry populations.
Proposed Model: We believe the strengths-based model is the most effective approach for our client population. Research by Bloomquist & Black (2010) found that a strengths-based approach resulted in significant reductions in recidivism rates among released prisoners compared to traditional models. Moreover, a study by Campbell et al. (2012) showcased improved mental health outcomes and increased social support networks among reentry clients utilizing strengths-based interventions.
Example of Service Delivery:
Imagine a case manager, Maria, working with John, a client recently released after serving five years for a non-violent crime. Maria conducts an initial assessment, focusing on John's strengths and aspirations. She discovers John's passion for art and his prior experience assisting a prison art program. Collaboratively, they set goals: secure stable housing, find employment using John's artistic skills, and connect with local art groups. Maria helps John access housing assistance, identify job opportunities in design and craftwork, and network with members of the community art guild.
Throughout the process, Maria celebrates John's achievements, recognizing his resilience, creativity, and resourcefulness. This collaborative approach empowers John to take ownership of his reintegration journey, fostering a sense of self-worth and confidence.
Conclusion: The strengths-based model aligns perfectly with our agency's philosophy of empowerment and holistic reintegration. By leveraging client strengths, fostering collaboration, and building internal resources, we can empower reentry clients to rebuild their lives, break the cycle of recidivism, and contribute positively to our community. We believe this model is not just the most effective, but also the most humane and hopeful approach to supporting those navigating the challenging journey back to society.
This essay offers a concise overview of our proposed case management model for your consideration. We are confident that the strengths-based approach will equip our clients with the tools and support necessary to successfully reintegrate, build fulfilling lives, and become thriving members of our community.