One of the best things about studying securities regulation

One of the best things about studying securities regulation is that the topic is often in the news. Every day, a company chooses to go public, an executive at a public company is charged with violating anti-fraud provisions, or company is investigated for bribing foreign government officials. This assignment asks that you choose one current event relevant to any of the topics we cover in the course and write a research paper describing what happened, the relevant law, and the significance of the story for the industry, the company, the law, and/or you. How to choose your current event: The current event must have been in the news within the last year. To find a topic of interest, read the news (The Wall Street Journal, The Economist, Financial Times), visit the SEC's website for press releases, or read some of the many blogs on securities regulation, white-collar crime, or corruption. You can also follow the SEC on Twitter. Once you find a news story, research it more deeply, including the relevant law. Your story does not have to be a case that has gone to court already. It can be an investigation, a proposed new rule or regulation, or any other story that touches the legal issues we study. What to include in your paper:  A detailed description of the current event.  A detailed discussion of the relevant law — explain the law from the very beginning, as if your reader knows nothing about the topic; this is how you demonstrate your understanding of the law.  An analysis of the current event — Why is it important to the industry? What companies will care about this news story? What will its impact be? Who will win? Why? You can choose to answer any or all these questions (or any other question). The goal is to demonstrate meaningful application of facts to the law and deep thinking about the issues presented by the news story.

Sample Solution

Current Event: SEC Charges Phoenix Real Estate Investor with Stock Manipulation Over Fake WeWork Offer

Detailed Description of the Current Event

On October 3, 2023, the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) charged Phoenix real estate investor Adam Neumann with stock manipulation over a fake WeWork offer. According to the SEC's complaint, Neumann, the founder and former CEO of WeWork, a shared office space company, made false and misleading statements about a $5 billion investment offer from SoftBank Group Corp. The SEC alleges that Neumann knew the offer was not firm or fully committed, but he made the statements anyway in an effort to boost WeWork's stock price.

Full Answer Section

Neumann allegedly made the false statements to the media and during investor presentations in the summer of 2019. He claimed that SoftBank had committed to investing $5 billion in WeWork, and that the deal was just days away from being finalized. These statements helped to boost WeWork's stock price, but they were false. The SoftBank investment never materialized, and WeWork's stock price plummeted when the truth was revealed. Detailed Discussion of the Relevant Law Section 10(b) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (Exchange Act) prohibits manipulative and deceptive practices in connection with the purchase or sale of securities. Rule 10b-5, which was promulgated under Section 10(b), provides more specific guidance on what constitutes a manipulative or deceptive practice. To establish a violation of Section 10(b) and Rule 10b-5, the SEC must prove that the defendant made a material misstatement or omission of fact, that the defendant knew or was reckless in not knowing that the statement was false or misleading, and that the defendant's statement or omission caused harm to investors. In this case, the SEC alleges that Neumann made material misstatements about the SoftBank investment offer. He claimed that the offer was firm or fully committed, when in fact it was not. These statements were false and misleading, and they caused harm to investors by artificially inflating WeWork's stock price. Analysis of the Current Event This case is significant for several reasons. First, it highlights the importance of accurate and truthful disclosure in the securities markets. Companies and their executives have a duty to disclose all material information to investors, and they cannot make false or misleading statements in an effort to boost their stock price. Second, this case demonstrates the SEC's commitment to enforcing the securities laws. The SEC has made it clear that it will not tolerate manipulative or deceptive practices, and it will hold executives accountable for their actions. Third, this case sends a message to investors that they should be vigilant in their investment decisions. Investors should not rely on statements made by company executives without doing their own research. They should also be aware of the risks of investing in companies that are subject to regulatory scrutiny. Conclusion The SEC's charges against Adam Neumann are a reminder that there are serious consequences for making false or misleading statements about securities. Companies and their executives must be truthful in their disclosures, and investors must be vigilant in their investment decisions.

We are here to help

We have crazy offers

It’s quick and easy to place an order. We have an efficient customer service that works 24/7 to assist you.It’s quick and easy to place an order. We have an efficient customer service that works 24/7 to assist you.

We are here and ready to help

Order Now