Political science

Political science

Topic: Critical theoretical approaches (such as Feminism and Post-Structuralism) argue that the scientific method/positivism is an inappropriate tool for the study of international relations. Do you agree? Why? Regardless of your answer, offer at least two advan

Paper details:

MUST USE THE REFERENCES THAT I PROVIDED

Critical theoretical approaches (such as Feminism and Post-Structuralism) argue that the scientific method/positivism is an inappropriate tool for the study of international relations. Do you agree? Why? Regardless of your answer, offer at least two advantages of the use of Critical Theory in the study of International Relations.

Be sure to cite all references. Instructions: Your initial post should be at least 350 words. Please respond to at least 2 other students. Responses should be a minimum of 150 words and include direct questions.

References

J.Ann Tickner, “You just don’t understand: Troubled engagements between Feminists and IR theorists.” International Studies Quarterly Vol. 41, Issue 4 (1997): 611-632 http://ezproxy.apus.edu/login?url=http://www.jstor.org/stable/2600855

Laura Sjoberg, “Gendered Realities of the Immunity Principle: Why Gender Analysis needs Feminism,” International Studies Quarterly, Vol. 50, Issue 4(2006): 889-910.http://ezproxy.apus.edu/login?url=http://www.jstor.org/stable/4092784

John M. Hobson and J.C. Sharman, “The Enduring Place of Hierarchy in World Politics: Tracing the Social Logics of Hierarchy and Political Change.” European Journal of International Relations Vol. 11, No.1 (2005): 63-98.http://ezproxy.apus.edu/login?url=http://search.proquest.com/docview/211965494?accountid=8289

Friedrich Kratochwil, “History, action, and identity: Revisiting the ‘Second” Great Debate and Assessing its Importance for Social Theory.” European Journal of International Relations Vol. 12, No.1 (2006): 5-29. http://ezproxy.apus.edu/login?url=http://search.proquest.com/docview/211985246?accountid=8289