Popper and Kuhn

    What, according to the authors we’ve read, is the relationship between (some or all of): (1) science; (2) philosophy of science; (3) philosophy (in general); and (4) history of science? Are some just subfields of the others? What, if at all, distinguishes one from the other(s)? Subject matter? Methodology? Something else? Which needs or can use the results of which other(s) to do their work? Which is most rational, most authoritative, most free? Which do our authors take themselves to be doing and why? The Authors that we read about is Carnap/Goodman/Quine/Popper/Kuhn Some of the readings in the attachments. Try to Focus more on Popper and Kuhn Thomas Kuhn, The Structure of Scientific Revolutions (Univ. of Chicago Press, 2012) (ISBN: 978-0226458120). Karl Popper, The Logic of Scientific Discovery (Routledge, 2002) (ISBN: 978-0415278447).