"Power of One" by Frances Haugen and "Pornography and Public Health" by Emily Rothman.

Book review: Choose between the "Power of One" by Frances Haugen or "Pornography and Public Health" by Emily Rothman.   Book Review Assignment: The Power of One by Frances Haugen (750 words) Haugen notes that for some of the teens devoted to Instagram, the peer pressure generated by the visually focused app led to mental health and body-image problems, and in some cases, eating disorders and suicidal thoughts, the research leaked by Haugen showed. One internal study cited 13.5% of teen girls saying Instagram makes thoughts of suicide worse and 17% of teen girls saying it makes eating disorders worse. Big picture, here is what your review should include: 1. Provide an introduction to the review, including bibliographic information and an overview of the memoir's central premise. 2. Demonstrate an understanding of the memoir's themes, these may include topics such as Facebook transparency, accountability in tech, and the impact of social media on society. Discusses these themes with specific references to Haugen's experiences. 3. Provide a critical analysis of Haugen's arguments and the broader implications for the tech industry and society. 4. Discusses the effectiveness of Haugen's narrative in conveying her message. 5. Use multiple, detailed examples from the memoir to support the analysis of Haugen's experiences and the issues raised. 6. Ask yourself: is this review well-written with no grammatical errors and a clear, coherent structure that enhances the analysis? Was the book an insightful exploration of the inner workings of Facebook and the broader tech industry? Did Haugen provide a detailed account of her journey from a humble background to becoming a whistleblower, revealing the harmful effects of Facebook's algorithms and lack of transparency How about the idea of a broader wisdom and the personal experiences Haugen shares? Was she effective in conveying the importance of these personal experiences? Was the book an approachable exploration of complex topics such as algorithms and the potential harm of Facebook's technologies? Is the book and her writing a good resource for understanding the issues surrounding social media and how they could realistically be mitigated? On the negative side did Haugen's grievances sometimes overshadow the larger issues at hand? Could we view the book more generally as a treatise on truth, with Haugen encouraging other tech employees to stand up against dishonesty? What did the book tell us about the lack of transparency and harmful algorithms? How effectively did Haugen highlight the dangers of algorithmic systems that prioritize profit over the well-being of users? What about her journey from idealism to Whistleblowing: Did the book detail Haugen's journey, from her initial belief in the positive potential of social media to her decision to become a whistleblower after she recognized the platforms' darker aspects and the misuse of algorithms? What about the role of personal experiences? What? Haugen’s formative experiences, including her academic background, personal challenges, and moral convictions, and how they played a significant role in her decision to expose Facebook's unethical practices. Can we consider the book a commentary on the impact of tech on democracy and society? What do Haugen's revelations underscore about the negative effects of Facebook's products on children, the stoking of division, tell us about the weakening of democracy? Does she effectively make a call for employee empowerment and transparency? Does the memoir effectively serve as a call to action for tech employees to stand up against dishonesty and for companies to embrace transparency to avoid fearing their employees and losing top talent? Are there insights into corporate responsibility? Can we view Haugen's story as a testament to the importance of corporate responsibility, human communication, and democracy, as well as the potential for individuals to create significant change? Finally, what about harm to children? Haugen has pointed out that Facebook's products can harm children's mental health. This includes the impact on teenage girls, where the platform's content and interaction dynamics can exacerbate mental health issues. What about corporate lying? She states: "The company intentionally hides vital information from the public, from the U.S. government and governments around the world," Haugen said in her testimony. "The documents I have provided to Congress prove that Facebook has repeatedly misled the public about what its research reveals about the safety of children, the efficacy of its artificial intelligence systems, and its role in spreading divisive and extreme messages." Emily Rothman's book, Pornography and Public Health provides an exploration of the complex relationship between pornography and public health issues. Big picture, here is what your review should include: A. Provide an introduction to the review, including bibliographic information and an overview of the memoir's central premise. B. Demonstrate an understanding of the book’s themes. C. Provide a critical analysis of Rothman’s arguments and the broader implications for individuals and society. D. Discusses the effectiveness of Rothman’s narrative in conveying her message. E. Use multiple, detailed examples from the book to support Rothman’s analysis of experiences and the issues raised. F. Provide a summary: Does Emily Rothman's Pornography and Public Health represent a significant contribution to the ongoing debate about the role of pornography in society? Is it a balanced and evidence-based perspective on a contentious topic? Is it an important read for anyone interested in the intersection of media, gender, and public health? G. Ask yourself: Is this review well-written with no grammatical errors and a clear, coherent structure that enhances the analysis? Please choose among (several) of the following questions to frame your review: 1. Does the book explore the positive and negative effects of pornography? What does the author hope to accomplish by considering pornography to be a public health crisis despite the lack of governmental support for this idea in the US? 2. Does Rothman provide a successful overview of pornography viewers, the content they are likely to encounter, and how this content has evolved? 3. Is the author successful in describing the impact of pornography on various aspects of human behavior and health, including aggression, body image, and compulsive use, while also acknowledging the potential benefits of porn literacy in certain contexts? 4. Rothman’s approach is evidence-based. Is she successful in drawing on research and data analysis? 5. Rothman aims to offer meaningful guidance for practice and policy. Is she successful in suggesting ways to minimize possible harms associated with pornography? 6. The book covers a range of subtopics within pornography scholarship. Is it a comprehensive resource for understanding one of the most complicated issues in health and human behavior today? 7. Rothman’s main argument is that while pornography may have various impacts on individuals, it should not be characterized as a public health crisis, and public health approaches should be evidence-based and nuanced, considering both the potential harms and benefits of pornography use. What do you think about this argument? 8. She advocates for harm reduction goals, such as motivating people to use less extreme pornography and less frequently, and increasing pornography literacy, rather than trying to end all use. Are these important goals? 9. Additional points you may wish to address: a. Rothman argues that while pornography can have negative health consequences for some individuals, it does not constitute a public health crisis as some have claimed. What is your opinion? b. Rothman argues against the notion that pornography is a crisis by stating that it does not fulfill the public health field’s definition of a public health crisis. She points out that pornography use has increased steadily over time rather than spiking or reaching a tipping point; it does not lead directly or imminently to death, disease, property destruction, or population displacement; and it does not overwhelm local health systems. What do you think about these ideas? c. Rothman’s approach is evidence-based, and she suggests that there may be negative health consequences for some people who use pornography, no substantial consequences for the majority, and even positive effects for some individuals, such as through safer sexual behaviors like solo masturbation. What do you think about these ideas?