- Original Crimson Article in 2003:
- Behind the scenes of the movie:
- Facebook Teen Ad Targeting:
- Stock Dilution Video:
C) Listen to the following podcasts about Section 230 and the ethical practices of Facebook. Write two takeaways from the material and opinion on if social media companies like Facebook should be open to product liability claims
- Facebook Podcast:
- Section 230 Podcast:
- Social Media Product liability
1-Articles:
-
- Podcast:
-
read the questions and answer the following in relation of the topic
PLEASE WRITE IN RELATION AND IN DETAIL TO THE TOPIC
ANSWER QUESTION A,B, AND C IN DETAIL
A) Watch the movie the social network and answer these questions:
1. Privacy and Data Accessibility (10:02) - In the scene where the university's student information, including emails, class years, and photos, is freely accessed and used by Mark to create a website, discuss the ethical considerations of using personal data found online. How does this scene reflect on current debates about privacy and data protection on social media platforms?
2. Intellectual Property and Ownership (Winklevoss Incident) - Explore the controversy surrounding the origination of the idea for Facebook. Should an idea belong to the one who conceived it, or to the one who executes it effectively? Discuss the complexities of intellectual property in the digital age.
3. University Governance vs. Federal/State Law - Can university policies override federal or state laws, especially in the context of disciplinary actions against students for their activities outside of academic requirements? If the answer is yes, what are the broader legal implications if university policies held more legal sway? If the answer is no, what purpose do university policies hold? Would students still be obligated to follow them?
4. Stock Dilution (01:42:58, 24 Million New Shares) - What is share dilution? Discuss the implications of stock dilution for original shareholders. What can be done, financially or legally, to prevent share dilution? What are the ethical considerations in diluting shares, especially in the context of startup growth and investment?
5. NDA and Public Disclosure The real-life cases of both the Winklevoss twins and Saverin both reach a settlement outside of the court. However, both cases also stipulate an NDA with the settlement. Describe the struggle between the adverse goals of NDAs and public interest. How does this tension affect perceptions of justice and truth?
6. Ethics and Freedom of Speech - Section 230 promotes free speech by removing strong incentives for platforms to limit what we can say and do online. Under Section 230, platforms generally may not be held liable for the content posted by users. Do you agree with Section 230? Should there be expectations or does this limit freedom of speech, which is protected in our first amendment. What's the duty of care for internet providers? Should Facebook be at all liable for what is posted or advertised on its website if it is harmful to consumers?
PART B). Review the links below and list two things that are interesting.
Sample Solution
The Social Network: A Deep Dive into Ethical Dilemmas
Part A: Movie Analysis
1. Privacy and Data Accessibility:
The scene raises serious concerns about the ethical use of personal data. Mark's actions violate individual privacy by using personal information without consent for commercial purposes. This reflects current debates about data privacy on social media, where platforms collect vast amounts of user data, raising concerns about misuse, targeted advertising, and potential discrimination.
2. Intellectual Property and Ownership:
The Winklevoss controversy highlights the complexities of intellectual property in the digital age. While the twins conceived the idea, Mark executed it differently. Determining ownership becomes challenging when ideas evolve and collaborations occur. This case underlines the need for clear agreements and communication regarding intellectual property rights, especially in collaborative ventures.
3. University Governance vs. Federal/State Law:
University policies generally cannot override federal or state laws. However, they can hold students accountable for misconduct that may not violate legal codes. This creates a balance between academic freedom and maintaining a safe and ethical learning environment. While students should adhere to policies, broader implications of increased university power require careful consideration.
Full Answer Section
While students should adhere to policies, broader implications of increased university power require careful consideration.
4. Stock Dilution:
Share dilution expands the number of outstanding shares, decreasing the ownership percentage of existing shareholders. This raises concerns for original investors who see their stake diluted. Financial measures like share buybacks and legal limitations on dilution can mitigate this, but ethical considerations remain regarding transparency and fair treatment of early investors.
5. NDA and Public Disclosure:
NDAs in settlements present a conflict between protecting confidentiality and public interest. While they protect sensitive information, they can also hinder transparency and accountability. This tension creates complexities in achieving justice and truth, especially when settlements involve powerful entities.
6. Ethics and Freedom of Speech:
Section 230 protects platforms from liability for user content, promoting free speech. However, it can shield platforms from responsibility for harmful content like hate speech or misinformation. Balancing free speech with accountability is crucial. While platforms shouldn't be held liable for everything, they have a duty to moderate harmful content and ensure responsible use.
Part B: Links Review (Information Not Provided)
Part C: Podcast Takeaways and Opinion
Unfortunately, I cannot access the specific podcast content you provided. However, based on the titles and topics, I can offer general takeaways and opinions:
Takeaways:
- Section 230 and its implications for platform liability are complex and debated.
- Ethical practices of Facebook and other social media companies are under scrutiny.
- Product liability for social media platforms is a growing issue.
Opinion:
Whether social media companies should be open to product liability claims is a nuanced issue. Holding them accountable for harmful content is crucial, but navigating the complexities of platform responsibility and freedom of expression requires careful consideration. Potential solutions could include:
- Graduated liability based on content moderation efforts.
- Increased transparency and accountability measures for platforms.
- Regulatory frameworks tailored for the specific nature of social media platforms.
Ultimately, striking a balance between free speech, user safety, and platform responsibility is essential for creating a healthier and more ethical online environment.
Please note: This response provides general insights based on the topics you outlined. For a more specific and comprehensive analysis, please share the content of the links and podcasts you mentioned.