Identify significant legal issue(s) in the case.For each issue, identify the legal rule that is relevant for that issueUse the legal rule to then analyze the facts of the case.In analyzing, break the rule down into different requirements.Address each requirement of that legal rule.Use a relevant fact to analyze each requirement.Then, connect the facts to the rule with an appropriate explanation.Finally, make a reasonable conclusion based on your analysis?
2. Complete 4 IRAC analysis on the following cases :
Steinberg vs. Chicago Medical SchoolEnnix v. StantenWellspan Health v. BaylissAnesthesia Medical Group, P.C. v. BurasT
