Supreme Court of the United States: Amber Guyger

  Paul, a law enforcement officer, arrests Barney for creating a disturbance at a subway station. While Barney is handcuffed facedown on the ground, Paul shoots and kills him. Paul claims that he accidentally grabbed his gun instead of his Taser. Is this an issue of criminal law or criminal procedure? How is this situation similar or different from the case involving Amber Guyger referenced in the document listed above? Explain your answer citing specific evidence from the text.  

Sample Solution

   

Whether the situation involving Paul and Barney is an issue of criminal law or criminal procedure depends on the specific facts of the case. If Paul is charged with a crime, such as manslaughter or murder, then the issue would be one of criminal law. Criminal law is the body of law that defines crimes and prescribes punishments for those crimes.

Full Answer Section

 

If Paul is not charged with a crime, but is instead sued by Barney's family, then the issue would be one of criminal procedure. Criminal procedure is the body of law that governs how the criminal justice system operates. This includes the rules for how arrests are made, how searches are conducted, and how trials are conducted.

In the case of Paul and Barney, it is possible that Paul could be charged with a crime. For example, if Paul intentionally shot Barney, then he could be charged with murder. However, it is also possible that Paul could not be charged with a crime. For example, if Paul accidentally shot Barney while trying to use his Taser, then he might not be charged with a crime.

The situation involving Paul and Barney is similar to the case involving Amber Guyger in a few ways. First, in both cases, the officer involved shot and killed an unarmed person. Second, in both cases, the officer claimed that he or she accidentally grabbed the wrong weapon. Third, in both cases, the shooting was investigated by the officer's own department.

However, there are also some important differences between the two cases. First, in the case of Paul and Barney, the officer was arresting the suspect for a minor offense. In the case of Amber Guyger, the officer was not arresting the suspect at all. Second, in the case of Paul and Barney, the suspect was handcuffed and facedown on the ground. In the case of Amber Guyger, the suspect was standing up and unarmed.

Ultimately, whether the situation involving Paul and Barney is an issue of criminal law or criminal procedure will depend on the specific facts of the case. If Paul is charged with a crime, then the issue will be one of criminal law. If Paul is not charged with a crime, but is instead sued by Barney's family, then the issue will be one of criminal procedure.

Here are some specific evidence from the text that support my answer:

  • "Paul claims that he accidentally grabbed his gun instead of his Taser." This statement suggests that Paul may not have intended to shoot Barney.
  • "Paul was arresting Barney for creating a disturbance at a subway station." This statement suggests that Barney was not posing a significant threat to Paul or anyone else.
  • "Barney was handcuffed and facedown on the ground." This statement suggests that Barney was not capable of harming Paul or anyone else.

Based on this evidence, it is possible that Paul could be charged with a crime, such as manslaughter or murder. However, it is also possible that Paul could not be charged with a crime. The specific facts of the case will ultimately determine whether Paul is charged with a crime.

IS IT YOUR FIRST TIME HERE? WELCOME

USE COUPON "11OFF" AND GET 11% OFF YOUR ORDERS