The differences in the historic development of Public Health and Global Health

Full Answer Section

Additionally:

• Funding: Historically, public health was funded primarily by national governments. Global health initiatives, on the other hand, often rely on international organizations and philanthropic donations, highlighting the need for collaboration and resource sharing across nations.
• Focus on inequities: While public health addresses inequalities within a country, global health specifically targets health disparities between developed and developing countries.

Sample Solution

Public health and global health, though intertwined, have distinct historical trajectories. Here are two key differences in their development:

1. Focus:

• Public health: Historically, public health focused on addressing local health issues within a specific geographic area, often a nation-state. Its primary concern was tackling diseases that readily spread within these boundaries, such as cholera outbreaks or childhood illnesses. Early efforts focused on sanitation, waste management, and improving living conditions in densely populated areas.

• Global health: Global health emerged later, driven by the recognition that health issues transcend borders. The rise of international travel and trade, coupled with the discovery of communicable diseases with global reach (like HIV/AIDS), necessitated a more coordinated international response. Global health initiatives tackle issues with a wider reach, focusing on disease control, pandemic preparedness, and health equity across different countries.

Reasoning:

• Limited scope of knowledge and travel: Early public health interventions were hampered by a limited understanding of disease transmission and the difficulties of international collaboration. Until the late 19th and early 20th centuries, the primary focus was on controllable issues within a nation's borders.
• Shifting global landscape: As transportation and communication improved, the concept of global health problems emerged. International travel facilitated the spread of diseases, and trade networks could unintentionally move health threats across borders. This necessitated a more coordinated global response.
• Colonial influences: While not entirely positive, colonialism played a role in shaping early global health initiatives. Colonial powers had a vested interest in controlling the spread of diseases in their colonies to protect their economic interests and maintain control. This interaction exposed the interconnectedness of health issues across geographic regions.