The Fall From Grace-Watergate

Sample Solution

Here's a balanced response to Schlesinger's argument about the Imperial Presidency, considering both sides:

Arthur M. Schlesinger Jr.'s argument in "The Imperial Presidency" (1973) has sparked ongoing debate. Let's explore both sides:

Arguments Supporting Schlesinger:

• Growth of Presidential Power: The Presidency has arguably gained power through various means:

  • Executive Orders: Issuing executive orders allows presidents to bypass the legislative process, raising concerns about accountability.

Full Answer Section

• • War Powers: The interpretation of the War Powers Resolution has allowed presidents to commit troops to military actions without congressional approval.
  • National Security: In the name of national security, presidents have expanded surveillance programs and authorized actions with limited transparency.

• Erosion of Checks and Balances: The increasing power of the presidency can be seen as a threat to the system of checks and balances envisioned by the Constitution. A strong presidency might overshadow the legislative and judicial branches.

Arguments Against Schlesinger:

• Changing Landscape: The framers of the Constitution couldn't anticipate the complexities of the modern world. The Presidency needs some flexibility to address unforeseen challenges.
• Congressional Gridlock: Partisan gridlock in Congress can impede progress. A strong executive might be necessary to move forward on critical issues.
• Public Approval: In times of crisis, the public often rallies around a strong president who can provide decisive leadership.

Finding Common Ground:

• Transparency and Accountability: Regardless of the extent of presidential power, ensuring transparency and accountability is crucial. Congress should exercise its oversight role effectively.
• Respecting Constitutional Limits: Striking a balance is important. The president should wield power within the constitutional framework, and Congress should fulfill its legislative and oversight responsibilities.

Conclusion:

Schlesinger's concerns about the Imperial Presidency remain relevant. Finding the right balance between a strong executive branch capable of decisive action and a system with checks and balances that prevents abuse of power is an ongoing challenge.