The pre-Civil War
1. Although the early settlers migrated to this country, the influx of immigrants is often seen as threatening. Explain what fueled this sentiment then and fuels it now. What was the anti-immigrant rhetoric then, and what is it now? Refer to readings and media as well as any outside research. How does the NASW advocate for and support the rights of these populations? (Refer to NASW-NY's Currents: Special Issue on Immigration Download Currents: Special Issue on Immigrationand other NASW resources as needed.)
2.The pre-Civil War era was a time of reform. Describe and explain the people who led these reform movements, and why. Whom or what were they trying to reform?
Also, within this period, children were both valued and devalued. Share your view of how children are valued and devalued today, supporting your claims with scholarly references and professional experience.
Sample Solution
Anti-immigrant sentiment has been a part of the American experience since the early days of the country. The first wave of anti-immigrant rhetoric was directed at Irish and German immigrants in the mid-19th century. These immigrants were seen as a threat to American values and culture. They were also seen as a drain on economic resources.
In the late 19th and early 20th centuries, anti-immigrant rhetoric was directed at Asian immigrants, particularly Chinese and Japanese immigrants. These immigrants were seen as a threat to American jobs and wages. They were also seen as a threat to American national security.
Full Answer Section
In the 21st century, anti-immigrant rhetoric is directed at immigrants from Mexico and Central America. These immigrants are seen as a threat to American jobs and wages. They are also seen as a threat to American national security. The anti-immigrant rhetoric of the past and present is often fueled by the same factors: fear of the unknown, xenophobia, and economic anxiety. Anti-immigrant rhetoric then In the 19th century, anti-immigrant rhetoric was often based on racist and nativist beliefs. Immigrants were seen as inferior to native-born Americans. They were also seen as a threat to the American way of life. For example, in 1855, the Know-Nothing Party was founded on a platform of anti-immigrant sentiment. The Know-Nothing Party advocated for stricter immigration laws and for the deportation of immigrants. Anti-immigrant rhetoric now In the 21st century, anti-immigrant rhetoric is often based on economic anxiety. Immigrants are seen as a threat to American jobs and wages. They are also seen as a drain on social services. For example, in 2016, Donald Trump used anti-immigrant rhetoric to win the presidency. Trump promised to build a wall on the border with Mexico and to deport millions of undocumented immigrants. How the NASW advocates for and supports the rights of immigrants The National Association of Social Workers (NASW) is a professional organization that represents social workers across the United States. The NASW advocates for and supports the rights of immigrants in a number of ways. For example, the NASW has a Code of Ethics that requires social workers to promote social justice and to protect the rights of vulnerable populations. The NASW also has a number of policies and programs that are designed to support immigrants. For example, the NASW has a policy on immigration that calls for comprehensive immigration reform and for the protection of the rights of immigrants. The NASW also has a program called the Center for Immigrants' Rights that provides legal and social services to immigrants.- Reform movements in the pre-Civil War era