Description
The question is “Many juries believe that DNA is one of the most important types of evidence used in criminal court cases. However, with an increasing number of wrongful convictions based on DNA evidence coming to light, some say we should no longer rely on DNA evidence in court. To what extent do you agree with this statement? Discuss the benefits and dangers of using DNA evidence to convict people and support your arguments with reference to relevant data and examples.” , it should be 1500 words, Harvard referencing, 15 sources , the thesis statement shoud state your point of view if you agree with this statement or not or to what extent
