which center on refuting an opponent’s perspective –

which center on refuting an opponent’s perspective – are antagonistic and can foster emotionally and negatively charged reactions against the argument and the people involved. Rogerian argument, based on the psychology of Carl Rogers, s eeks to diffuse those situations by thoroughly considering different stances on issues, finding common ground, and arriving at a compromise . The task of Rogerian argument, then, is to address conflicting views fairly, accurately, and empathetically. This a ppr oach can strengthen any argument , since it demonstrates that one has considered other possibilities before arriving at a belief. The end result of a Rogerian argument is a compromised solution that is more likely to satisfy all parties. For this essay your task is to develop your own original argument about some theme or social topic. Rather than focusing on one side as you might have done in previous essays , now you will examine differ ing viewpoints on a single theme with the goal of articulating a “middle ground” position between opposing viewpoints. Due Dates: ENGL 1 2 13 - 02 Rough Draft [ BRING PAPER COPY ] and Peer Edit 1 Dec. 2014 Final Packet ( Final Draft, Doc Pac, Peer Edit Sheet, Peer Edited Rough Draft) 8 Dec. 2014 Final Micro theme [IN CLASS FINAL] 8 Dec. 2014 Objectives: ? Use invention techniques such as brainstorming, listing, cubing, reporters’ questions, freewriting, and clustering. ? Consider an external audience to guide tone, vocabulary, and content . ? Establish a tone that is suitable to both your topic and purpose. ? Write in a clea r, concise, and engaging manner. ? Think outside of binary oppositions, which often doom a debate to failur e. ? Develop the skill to address emotionally charged topics with a degree of intellectual o bjectivity. Learn how to use the rhetorical triangle effectively. ? Integrate or synthesize the ideas from selected sources . ? Learn the value and necessity of compromise when approaching complex issues. ? Write an essay that is thoroughly developed and logically organized. ? Incorporate in - text citations and a complete Works Cited page. ? Utilize the writing process – inventing, writ ing, revising, and editing – from start to finish. ? Achieve a tone that is accessible and academic. ? No personal pronouns; no c ontractions; use formal, academic English (specific, concise, organized, connected). F ern Thung OC ENGL 1 2 13 - 02 FALL 201 4 pg. 2 Requirements : ? MLA format; 12 - point font (Times New Roman ) . ? 6 - 7 pages, typed, double - spaced ( not including Works Cited page). ? 3 sources minimum (at least 1 source must support side A ; more may be used. At least one source must support side B ; more may be used). ? At least three [3] i ntegrated quotations to support and illustrate each of the arguments presented must be used. ? You must submit copies of any articles and materials , if outside sources are used [Doc Pac] . ? You must submit the peer - edited rough draft, the peer edit sheet, and the final draft in order for your final essay submission to be accepted and graded . ? P lace all materials, drafts, etc. in a folder for submission [Email submission is fine.] Techniques: ? Begin by finding a reading from which you can identify multiple perspectives (arguments) on an issue. An argument might be identified from a character’s position in a narrative, an author’s voice in an essay or from a narrator in a poem. ? Once you have ch osen your reading, ask a few of the following complex questions 1 : o How are the Side A/Side B argument s true? o What are some examples from my sources that support those position s ? o What common ground exists between Side A & Side B? o How can that common ground be expressed in a new, compromised claim? o What evidence is there in support of a common ground argument? o What is my proposal for compromise on this issue? How does it differ from the information in my sources? ? Looking over the answers to those questions, begin to articulate the complex question that might address the variety of answers you have identified. ? Remember that your thesis statement will likely take the form of a complex question. ? Rogerian argument finds a common gro und between Side A & Side B. 1 In this case a complex question means a question with one independent clause and at least one dependent clause. Do not confuse this sentence structure with the logical fallacy “Complex Question.” See logicalfallacies.info for more details. PLACE THIS ORDER OR A SIMILAR ORDER WITH US TODAY AND GET AN AMAZING DISCOUNT :)