Innovation Management Outcome Development Scoring Guide
Note: Your instructor may also use the Writing Feedback Tool to provide feedback on your writing. In the tool, click on the linked resources for helpful writing information.
Innovation Management Outcome Development Scoring Guide Grading Rubric
Criteria Non-performance Basic Proficient Distinguished
Analyze innovation management (IM) in a manner that demonstrates knowledge of concepts and provides ample justification for the position taken.
50% Does not outline IM in a manner that demonstrates knowledge of concepts nor lists justification for position taken. Describes IM in a manner that demonstrates knowledge of concepts and provides some justification for position taken. Analyzes IM in a manner that demonstrates knowledge of concepts and provides ample justification for position taken. Analyzes IM in a manner that demonstrates knowledge of concepts, provides ample justification for position taken, and uses data and research in a convincing manner.
Communicate in a manner expected of doctoral-level composition and exhibit critical thinking skills.
50% Does not communicate in a manner expected of doctoral-level composition and does not exhibit critical thinking skills. Communicates at a basic level and exhibits some critical thinking skills. Communicates in a manner expected of doctoral-level composition and exhibits critical thinking skills. Communicates exceptionally well as expected of doctoral-level composition and exhibits exceptional critical thinking skills.

Scholl Velvet Smooth Express Pedi with Diamond Crystalsas our product of choice.I choose this product because it was Reckitt Benckiser Group 2015 innovation. Here is the website you can go to learn more https://www.rb.com/new-product-launches-2015.
Read chapter 1-5 of the book highlighted in yellow below
McLaughlin, G. C., & Caraballo, V. (2013). Chance or choice: Unlocking innovation success. Boca Raton, FL: CRC Press.
Innovation Management Outcome Development
Innovation has different meanings to individuals. It is either something that is new, improved, or changed. At times, it is often confused with quality or process improvement. This is the primary reason innovation outcomes are often difficult to execute. Innovation is dominated by the strategy literature, but making innovation an operational reality is the responsibility of the teams that are assigned innovation projects. Based on the readings, discuss with your teammates what innovation means to you, and then align your perspectives and develop an innovation outcome for your team.
In this assignment, you will describe the process through the objectify phase of the ENOVALE (E-N-O) Process.Read chapter 1-5 of this bookMcLaughlin, G. C., & Caraballo, V. (2013). Chance or choice: Unlocking innovation success. Boca Raton, FL: CRC Press. In order to complete information highlighted in yellow which is the information highlighted above in yellow.Provide your response as a consolidated team response. Your instructor has assigned you to a team. Provide your response from the perspectives of the following industries:Team B.Your team is responsible for developing an innovation project for a company in the consumer packaged goods manufacturing industry. You are free to select any product as long as it is judged to be innovative. Consider how you are defining innovation, who accepts it, what your team believes is innovative, and is it the right team? You may want to discuss the challenges of this exercise. Is quality a consideration in the process? Also remember that you operate on a global scale.